Quote:You have just found a pile of conspiracy theories by using Google? Exxon contributes to politicians? Shocking!


 

I have a scientific basis for my viewpoint. You just keep claiming I'm wrong, when you don't even know my entire viewpoint and can't address a single statement I have made here. So who is it that refuses to consider the science? Here's a hint, it's not me.


Here's an interesting article by Scott (Dilbert) Adams. The comments section has discussions from both sides of the argument, so you can read through them and see whose logic makes more sense.


 

http://blog.dilbert.com/post/15408241605...ge-science

I appreciate you proving my point that everything you disagree with is lies and/or fake. It's all a conspiracy even though it's not but it is to you because it has to be.  

 

I know your entire viewpoint. This isn't the first thread you have laid it out in. Even if you hadn't I would know what it is because I follow right wing politics and you fall in line with it. The right wing has denied climate change in various (and ever evolving) ways for a long time and has spent time and money to try and prove they are right. If they had done so in a sufficient manner the majority of professionals and practitioners of the field or tertiary fields would concur or be more open to it. Since they don't, one can only assume that they are not on the correct path. 

 

There is no point in debating with someone on this when neither of us really understand. You think you do which is fine however foolhardy it is to assume you know more than experts in a field. I, on the other hand can admit I do not fully understand it as it's not my area of expertise and defer to those experts. Should their opinion or results change on the matter so will mine. 

 

I say experts have more weight in the so called debate and you think you know more and I find that laughable. 

---