Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Points given up that should not be assigned to the Jags D

#41
(This post was last modified: 12-07-2016, 10:45 PM by Jaguarmeister.)

Quote:Ravens game:


Bortles eludes a sack, rolls left, then fumbles the ball away in his own territory.


Ravens ball. Jags defense immediately holds. Justin Tucker comes out and nails a FG.

3 points there, the defense had nothing to do with it. They stopped the Ravens from advancing.


That's happened quite a few times this season. Heck, the KC game was almost nothing but possessions starting in FG range. Defense holds in 3 downs,, KC nails 3 points.
 

 

That's not what happened.  Tucker's game winning 53 yard field goal came after Baltimore blocked Myers 52 yard field goal and moved the ball down the field killing most of what was left on the clock before Tucker, one of the best kickers in the league, nailed the 53 yarder.  They ended up getting 22 yards on the drive as they started on their 43 yard line.  Also, Blake took a 9 yard sack right before our blocked FG attempt, the one thing he absolutely couldn't do in that situation.

 

We then had just over a minute left after Tucker hit his FG to get ourselves back into FG range for what would be a FG attempt to win.  Blake essentially sacked himself on 2nd down by running out of bounds 7 yards behind the line of scrimmage instead of throwing the ball away.  That and an offensive holding call on 3rd down ensured we wouldn't get another first down and the game was over.


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Messages In This Thread
Points given up that should not be assigned to the Jags D - by Jaguarmeister - 12-07-2016, 10:26 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!