Quote:The knee jerk denial from Trump supporters is just incredible. 

 

So now we can add "I don't believe the intelligence community" to "I don't believe the scientific community" and "I don't believe the media."  

 

Why don't you guys just say, "I only believe people who tell me what I want to hear.   And if they tell me what I want to hear, I don't even question it." 

 

Then there's "I don't care what the Russians did because Trump is still better than Clinton."   So it's okay for a foreign government to influence a US election, as long as it's in favor of your candidate? 

 

What's incredible is that you pretend that criticism against people who agree with you somehow makes us crazy. Not only is that a weak tactic used to invalidate the opposing opinion, the examples you gave aren't even true.

 

Well, maybe the media one, but I'm not even sure how / why you'd even try to defend them. But I think we both know that if you simply distort the actual opinion and make it seem more radical, it'll keep you from actually addressing the specific issue.

 

 

Quote:No, it's not, that's just a (quite ironic) deflection from attention to the real possibility the Russians hacked into email servers.

 

Real possibility? The same possibility that eliminated Russian involvement (by the FBI) after Hillary's server scandal?

 

Excuse me if I'd prefer to wait to hear the details about Russian involvement before jumping to conclusions. 

 

Quote:This just gets better and better. The Trumpettes doing back-flips and excuses, excuses, excuses. LOL

 

People who backed the Birther Movement now want Proof! Mere speculation! What about Hillary! It's the media!

 

Four years of watching people like jj, who wants people to think he's some kind of "real" conservative, with principles even!, try and deflect every pro-Russian, pro-yahoo move that Trump makes. These defenders of the "little guy, working class heroes" and going to justifying every billionaire and general put before them.

 

The sell-out continues! And they've done it before he's even sworn in. 

 

Looks like you took RealMarty's style of argument.

 

Ad hominems every where.

 

Are you going to address the lack of evidence as the reason people are weary to accept statements from a group (Democrats) who already tried this method before (Russian involvement with the serves)?

---