Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
USA Today Article about Jags' Defense

#62

Quote:I disagree... These players, for the most part are all young. We got rid of most of our vets and blew up the entire team when Gus took over. In addition to that, we're playing this seattle defense that needs to be coached and properly implemented.


I think you assume that just because these guys played college ball, they are all completely formed players that you can plug and play with little coaching.


That's not how this works. Especially given that the Seattle 3 deep zone system is not what any of these players were used to playing before they got here. So yeah, I totally disagree with what you're saying here.


You are correct that nobody knows what goes on during film sessions and subsequent practices, but are you gonna sit there with a straight face and say that you are confident that our players are getting the most out of their time under Gus?


The regression that we've seen from almost every player (besides Lee) is not some freak accident. Think it through.


Just so you know, the difference in cover 3 and 2 is the responsibilities of the secondary. The lb zones are the same (exception being you move the strong side lb into the flat as opposed to the SS). Anyone who has played at least high-school would have plenty experience running both. As far as Bradley's version, the design of stopping the run is different, but not on a mad scientist level. Every defense will have a spot of vulnerability when it comes to coverage.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
USA Today Article about Jags' Defense - by Jerrad - 12-13-2016, 09:32 AM
USA Today Article about Jags' Defense - by rocdee - 12-13-2016, 09:33 AM
USA Today Article about Jags' Defense - by Jerrad - 12-13-2016, 02:28 PM
USA Today Article about Jags' Defense - by D6 - 12-15-2016, 05:27 AM
USA Today Article about Jags' Defense - by Kane - 12-15-2016, 11:35 AM
USA Today Article about Jags' Defense - by Kane - 12-15-2016, 11:37 AM
USA Today Article about Jags' Defense - by Guest - 12-15-2016, 04:13 PM
USA Today Article about Jags' Defense - by raweyejag - 12-16-2016, 11:12 PM
USA Today Article about Jags' Defense - by Guest - 12-16-2016, 11:25 PM
USA Today Article about Jags' Defense - by Guest - 12-17-2016, 12:37 PM
USA Today Article about Jags' Defense - by Adub28 - 12-17-2016, 04:29 PM
USA Today Article about Jags' Defense - by Guest - 12-17-2016, 04:42 PM
USA Today Article about Jags' Defense - by Guest - 12-17-2016, 05:38 PM
USA Today Article about Jags' Defense - by Guest - 12-17-2016, 06:05 PM



Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!