Quote:Romo was rushed back for his second collar bone. Peyton was coming back from neck surgery that was extremely serious lets not pretend that it was just any old season he missed. People were legitimately scared he wouldnt walk after taking a hit. And please spare me the Romo choke narrative while youre bringing up Peyton, if you cant see the irony in that idk what to tell you.

But alright, Romo is injury prone. Lets not bother taking a risk that if payed off would more than likely pay off in droves. Instead lets just sit on our hands and hope some stiff competition between Blake Bortles(whos played SO well for us so far) and Mike Glennon/Nick Foles/Matt Moore(who have some very illustrious careers on their own) to get this franchise some wins again. Surely going into the season with all your stock on a quarterback whos been bottom 5 for 3 seasons and another who couldnt start is destined for success.

Peyton has 2 rings. Does Romo even have 2 playoff victories? I'm not even willing to continue that conversation, as even SLIGHTLY trying to insinuate Romo is in the same SCHOOL, let alone CLASS as Peyton is absolutely laughable.


Yes, Peyton's one injury was very scary. The upside of Peyton was INFINITELY higher than Romo or any other QB not named Brady.


The problem with your argument is that its a complete fallacy. It's not "Romo or nothing". There are better options out there than Romo. Garrapolo showed promise, Matt Moore showed some promise, etc.


Yes, I want REAL competition to be brought it. I don't yet know where that comes from. I know it's not Romo, though. Romo has talent, but he's incredibly fragile. It's been that way his whole career. I just can't put my chips behind a guy who is more likely than not to be injured and fail to finish the season.

---