Quote:You seem to gloss over this:


 

 

The very text admits that the models are wrong. The hot spot is supposed to be in the upper troposphere. The warming they are measuring is in the mid-troposphere, hence the not quite as high statement ("high" here refers to elevation). This does not support the existence of the hot spot.


Why are they using the limited radiosonde balloon data when the satellite data has full coverage of the region, and shows no hot spot? Could it be because the satellite data give an even worse fit to the models?


 

You have pasted parts of two papers. Both paper select data that fits the narrative (eliminating what doesn't fit) and adjust the remaining data to better fit the narrative. That's not what science does, that's what religion does.


 

And why are you not appalled at the lie from NASA.gov? If you really are a scientist you should be.