Quote:I would not put Mack, Matthews or Barr in the level of player of Clowney or Bridgewater. 

 

I know Clowney had a season where effort lacked. But the assumption is that Clowney pretty much mailed it in because he did not want to get hurt and ruin his draft stock. 

 

Clowney's ability is off the charts. His ceiling towers over Mack or Barr. 

 

Not trying to bust your chops, but what changed since Christmas, when you posted this...

 

Quote: 

<p class="">Posted 25 December 2013 - 05:39 PM

<p class="">Teal Curtain, on 25 Dec 2013 - 5:38 PM, said:<a class="" href='http://jungle.jaguars.com/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=90708'></a>

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Teal Curtain" data-cid="90708" data-time="1388011108">

My questions to you are.... Do you think Barr can be an every down DE? He plays OLB at UCLA. Do you pick a passing down DE that high?

 

would he fit the LEO?

 

If Barr is projected as a perennial All-pro, which some football people do....then I'd say a perennial all pro at a premium position is worth a selection at 3. 

 

He not only is very talented, gifted, but also has a passion for the game, and is a leader thats missing on the D.

</blockquote>
 

http://jungle.jaguars.com/index.php?/top...r-clowney/

 

It seems in less than a week's time, you lost your enthusiasm over Barr.

 

Granted, you could still think that highly of Barr and stil think Clowney's talent is superior to Barr's, but now that the team is in position to get Barr, you seem disappointed.

---