Quote:You have got to be kidding me.  You've acted personally offended at any comment I've made that dares question any of these moves.

 

You've been the kool aid man the past week or longer.  It's where you're coming up with the pitchfork nonsense.  That's certainly not a "no one knows" approach...

 

We were the laughing stock for interviewing Kelly for HC.  To think it somehow makes it better by bringing him back once again for OC talks, is just... wow.  We look twice as questionable.

 

The only people not laughing at the name Chip Kelly right now are a hand full of glib Jaguar fans who don't see the lunacy in even considering him.

 

Someone described the idea of bringing in Kelly as "the most Jaguar thing ever."  I usually laugh along with that kind of thing because we've heard it all already.  But this time it stings, because it's true.

I just went back and read my posts.

 

Stated what he did in PHI and SF statistically and how he had offenses that were very successful with little talent. Am I wrong there?

 

Said he has a great offensive mind. There's plenty of risk, but a good chance to take. This is drinking the kool-aid and going "all in".

 

Disagreeing with people saying otherwise and stating why I disagree with it. Again, going all-in just because I disagree with what they are saying?

 

Then saying we need to wait and see what this new regime does before bringing out the pitchforks as this isn't the same set of guys that made decisions/coaches this team to the terribleness that has been the Jaguars for the last decade.

 

Sure bud, again, grasping at straws. But go ahead, keep going.

---