Quote:I just went back and read my posts.

 

Stated what he did in PHI and SF statistically and how he had offenses that were very successful with little talent. Am I wrong there?

 

Said he has a great offensive mind. There's plenty of risk, but a good chance to take. This is drinking the kool-aid and going "all in".

 

Disagreeing with people saying otherwise and stating why I disagree with it. Again, going all-in just because I disagree with what they are saying?

 

Then saying we need to wait and see what this new regime does before bringing out the pitchforks as this isn't the same set of guys that made decisions/coaches this team to the terribleness that has been the Jaguars for the last decade.

 

Sure bud, again, grasping at straws. But go ahead, keep going.

 

I was commenting on your reflexive instinct to defend every move against all criticism of them, which you've done.  Slick dodge.  You've trolled before, I see.

 

A "wait and see" person isn't one who selectively tries to shoot down every opposing opinion that isn't sold on all the latest moves (or rumors, in this case.)

 

An objective person wouldn't be so bent, as you appear to be, in opposing dissent toward the idea of Kelly and selling how "good" the idea is.

 

Most would say "fair enough" and move on.

 

You chose not to.  And continue to choose not to.

---