The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
The Republican circus continues with Betsy DeVos showing how little she knows about Education
|
01-19-2017, 06:53 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-19-2017, 06:54 PM by The Eleventh Doctor.)
Quote:Then macroevolution doesn't either, as it is merely a theory as to the origins of human existence. Science is meant to deal in the observable. If it isn't observable, then it isn't science. Science isn't just observable. And Macroevolution has PLENTY OF evidence supporting it. Just because you don't like the evidence doesn't mean you get to say there isn't any. Meanwhile there's no evidence of creationism. If there were, then it'd be fine to teach it in a science class.
I was wrong about Trent Baalke.
|
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.