The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Trump's EPA pick took hands-off approach to environmental crisis that shook Oklahoma
|
Quote: And how is this anything different than what I just said? Y ou are the one who said that the CFC destroys ozone, yet your chemistry demonstrates that it is free chlorine, which is what I said. You're the one who doesn't understand chemistry in this argument. The same effect can be had if the reaction is HCl ---> H+ + Cl- or NaCl ---> Na+ + Cl-. You still get the free Cl to catalyze the destruction of ozone, but the source is natural. "Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?" |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.