Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Trump's EPA pick took hands-off approach to environmental crisis that shook Oklahoma

#61

Quote:1989). At least two factors reduce the impact of HCl, chlorine appears to be preferentially released during low-levels of volcanic activity and thus may be limited to the troposphere, where it can be scrubbed by rain. Hydrogen chloride may also condense in the rising volcanic plume, again to be scrubbed out by rain or ice. Lack of HCl in ice cores with high amounts of H2SO4 (from large eruptions) may indicate ambient stratospheric conditions are extremely efficient at removing HCl. Thus, most HCl never has the opportunity to react with ozone. No increase in stratospheric chlorine was observed during the 1991 eruption of Mt. Pinatubo.
 

Volcanoes are a source of HCl, but most HCl comes from the oceans (technically from a chemical reaction which converts oceanic NaCl to HCl in the atmosphere).


 

"most HCl never has the opportunity to react with ozone"         


 

Note it says "most" not "all." HCl levels are ten times CFC levels, so if  only10% of the HCl has the opportunity to release free chlorine (or react directly, does HCl do that or was the passage technically incorrect?) then we're talking about an equal effect, 20% would be double the effect. There was no number given, just the vague word "most, " so either the science is not exact on this or the author ignored the science.


 

Note the word "may" was used several times, indicating the whole passage was speculation, not science.


 

My original comment was that you were wrong about CFCs reacting with ozone. Your very own chemistry post proved I was right. You also made a ridiculous comment about chlorine in the atmosphere killing life on Earth. If you are an example of the quality of scientists these days, then science is in sad shape.





                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Messages In This Thread
Trump's EPA pick took hands-off approach to environmental crisis that shook Oklahoma - by MalabarJag - 01-23-2017, 12:11 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!