Quote:But 31 other teams are picking. It doesn't mean those guys will be there when we pick. You got to take your number 1 guy each pick.


We probably will take a RB at number 4.


The same can be said about every position. Don't take this guy bc this this and this guy could be had in whatever round.

 

 

The thing is, if your #1 guy on the board is very close to a similar player/players who are projected to go later, it would be much smarter in my eyes to trade down and add more picks. In my opinion, I see no standout "can't miss" players in this draft. I see a lot of really good players who can help us at a variety of positions, but none that are "must haves", especially with the #4 overall pick. I think it would be such a waste if we used the #4 pick on a guy when we could possibly trade down, add picks to fill more needs and select very similar players to what we could have gotten at #4.

---