The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
The "Tolerant" Left strikes again
|
Quote:You bet your butt being able to marry someone you love regardless of their gender is progress. It may not mean a thing to you and perhaps you disagree, so progress would never be the word you'd use. I'ts tremendous progress for those of us who never had that right previously. The only "progress" that you are about to enjoy is to enter into a "civil union" and call it a "marriage". The "progress" is that you will be able to legally call it a marriage. It doesn't matter to you or other leftists that the term "marriage" has deeper meaning to a far more majority of the population. Here's a couple of questions for you. Why is it so important to gays to call a legal process a "marriage"? I thought that religion and legal stuff was supposed to be separated. Legally it's a union between two people which essentially is a contract. A heterosexual couple getting "married" has to sign the same document that a gay couple has to sign. That document is basically a legal contract. Regardless if it's a gay union or a heterosexual union, that's the legal part of it that involves government. Should that document be called a "marriage license" or should it be more generic and called a "civil union license" regardless of the genders of the people signing it? The term "marriage" is used by many religions and often includes some kind of ritual that means a union between two members of that religion, often and usually a male and a female have joined together. Why is it that gays seem to think that they can hijack and use that term as their own? This leaves the realm of law and enters the realm of religion. For the record and I really do mean this. I am happy for you and I wish you the best of luck. If you happen to have a couple of invitations to the event, my wife and I surely would attend. If not, I do understand. We may not agree politically, but you and I are both long time posters on this board and I do respect you. There are 10 kinds of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those who don't. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.