Login

MalabarJag · 02-08-2017, 10:58 AM

Quote:Sea levels are rising. It is not a lie.

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v53...17145.html

Polar temperatures over the last several million years have, at times, been slightly warmer than today, yet global mean sea level has been 6–9 metres higher as recently as the Last Interglacial (130,000 to 115,000 years ago) and possibly higher during the Pliocene epoch (about three million years ago). In both cases the Antarctic ice sheet has been implicated as the primary contributor, hinting at its future vulnerability. Here we use a model coupling ice sheet and climate dynamics—including previously underappreciated processes linking atmospheric warming with hydrofracturing of buttressing ice shelves and structural collapse of marine-terminating ice cliffs—that is calibrated against Pliocene and Last Interglacial sea-level estimates and applied to future greenhouse gas emission scenarios. Antarctica has the potential to contribute more than a metre of sea-level rise by 2100 and more than 15 metres by 2500, if emissions continue unabated. In this case atmospheric warming will soon become the dominant driver of ice loss, but prolonged ocean warming will delay its recovery for thousands of years.

Here is the NSF grant that funded the study:

https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAwar...ID=1202632

Sea levels have been rising for a long time. The lie is about an acceleration in the sea level rise. You call yourself a scientist and don't know the meaning of "acceleration?"

Go look at the tide gauges on NOAA.gov. None show an acceleration in the rate of sea level change, going back to before 1900 in some cases.

As a scientist, are you OK with the scientists on NASA.gov lying about an acceleration?

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"