The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Hundreds of Scientists Say Climate Change Is Not Science, CO2 Is Benign
|
Quote:1) You are making a lot of assumptions. First, depending on the glass type it will reflect some infrared light because the glass itself has a refractive index that is different from the air. It will also absorb some of the infrared light, but this is also dependent on the type of glass. The dessicators have a fairly thick glass but they are also transparent so they will retain some infrared energy but also allow some infrared to pass through. But the glass isn't why the temperature is rising in the dessicator with the CO2. The thermal properties of gaseous CO2 are why the temperature rises. This experiment is purely an illustration of the greenhouse effect. That is all. The greenhouse effect is due to absorbed thermal radiation on the earth being re-emitted back into the atmosphere. Certain gases such as carbon dioxide have the ability to absorb thermal radiation in the form of infrared radiation and re-emit back to the environment glcrraring a positive feedback loop. Carbon thus acts as a thermal insulator. I believe you have a poor understanding of the greenhouse effect, which is all this experiment is demonstrating. How it relates to Climate Change? Well the emission of greenhouse gases by humans is thought to be strongly correlated with accelerated (the rate of change) climate change. You apparently didn't bother to read read what I wrote. I understand how CO2 absorbs IR. That has never been a point of disagreement. Maybe Daily Kos claims that, but it's not the case. Skeptics of all types, even those who totally discount any greenhouse effect of CO2 (of which I'm not one) still agree that CO2 absorbs in the IR. The point is that the effect in that small amount of CO2 is swamped by the differences in the glass (among other things). The IR region where CO2 does most of its absorbing is the same region where glass absorbs CO2. This is why CO2 lasers use windows made of NaCl or KCl. And you didn't comment on the most important part, the flagrant lie by Bill Nye in the thermometer display. "Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?" |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.