Quote:Again, I would make the point, that some men look like men but they have lady parts.  So that guy will HAVE to follow that little girl into the ladies' room UNDER PENALTY OF LAW if the conservatives have their way.  Because he's got a lady part.  And all he wants to do is go into the men's room and use the stall so no one is the wiser.  But you wouldn't let him!  You'd make him use the ladies' room! 

 

Conversely, there are "chicks with [man parts that rhymes with chicks]"  and that person will be standing at the urinal next to you.  A really hot "girl" whipping it out at the urinal next to you!  You okay with that?   Because that's what your proposal would bring about.   All "she" wanted to do was go into the ladies' room, but you wouldn't let her, because "she" had man parts. 

 

Really, this is so confusing, I want to see different laws passed in different states and see what happens. 

if someone has the same thing between their legs as I do, they should use the same bathroom I do which is the mens...If they do not have the same man part they should use the womens...its pretty simple...If you have a winkie you should not go into a womans bathroom, if you do not have a winkie, you should not go into a mans bathroom...what they look like makes no difference, it's whats between their legs that matter 

---