Quote:Yes I think it's Constitutional. The government is not targeting a specific religion since the policy would apply to any religion, and even a group of atheists if one of their members committed an anti--religious terrorist act.


 

 

Dylan Roof was not acting on a religious belief, he was acting on racism. Assuming he was part of a white supremacist group I'd burn down their meeting hall and bury him under a black panther flag.

 

You cannot seriously think such acts by the government would be constitutional.  You seriously think the government can and should take someone's property because of someone else's crime?  Seriously?  You seem to think the government has the right to do whatever they want, and the citizens have no Constitutional protection whatsoever.  Seriously.  Am I getting whooshed again? 

 

You're saying the government can come in and take my property to punish someone else that I don't even know for a crime they committed.   They can burn down my church, burn down my meeting hall, take my property, whatever they want, in order to punish someone else.  That's okay with you? 

 

Someone in your church commits a crime, so then the government can burn down your church in response to that.  That's your solution to terrorism?   I think I much rather keep the terrorists. 

---