Quote:OK. I'll bite.


The jaguars led the NFL in cap space in 2016 when the Ivory contract was put together. The same argument you are making for the browns you make against the jaguars. You're either a clown with zero credibility, an idiot, or both.




<span style="font-family:arial;">the jaguars paid a lot of money for a 26/27 year old running back that just had a very good season with the jets when they had more money to spend than they would have been able to.
</span>

<span style="font-family:arial;">the browns paid a lot of money for an unknown second rounder when they had more money to spend than they would have been able to.
</span>

<span style="font-family:arial;">bad for the jags
</span>
<span style="font-family:arial;">good for the browns
</span>

<span style="font-family:arial;">makes total sense.
</span>

We didnt take Ivorys contract on because we would get a pick out of it.


Our front office actually thought that chris ivory deserved to be paid that much. Thats why is monumentally worse. The browns took on a contract for a short time for the express purpose of getting a resource. We paid made a 28 year old running back with one 1000 yard season in his career a top 5 contract in total value.


The browns did this for a pick, the jaguars gave money to someone that didnt deserve it for no outside gain whatsoever


So no this isnt the same. The only common ground is that two bad players are getting paid more than theyre worth.

---