Quote:We didnt take Ivorys contract on because we would get a pick out of it.


Our front office actually thought that chris ivory deserved to be paid that much. Thats why is monumentally worse. The browns took on a contract for a short time for the express purpose of getting a resource. We paid made a 28 year old running back with one 1000 yard season in his career a top 5 contract in total value.


The browns did this for a pick, the jaguars gave money to someone that didnt deserve it for no outside gain whatsoever


So no this isnt the same. The only common ground is that two bad players are getting paid more than theyre worth.

 

Easy for you to say that Ivory didn't deserve it now. When the jags signed him, they signed him on the premise that he would be as productive as he was in NY. If he played up to that potential, you wouldn't be saying it was a bad contract. (well actually im sure you and the rest of the whine brigade would find a way.) But if the guy the browns draft is a bust, then they wasted 22 million dollars, which will be more than the jaguars spent on ivory. 

---