Quote:Let me clarify. 

"If the NFL approves a team to move to London"

 

Because the Jaguars just are the most logical option.

 

Think of it this way, say another team (BILLS) move to London. Would the NFL allow other teams to have 1 "home game" in London in addition to the already established home team?

The answer would be NO because that would dig into the established teams fan base/ local revenue, which would be to entire/sole reason a team would move there in the first place. 

 

Do you think the Jaguars are to remain profitable in Jacksonville without a "home" game in London? The Jags would take a HUGE hit in Local revenue if they don't have that home game in London.

 

The other scenario would be to play in different areas in London which would have different teams having a "home game" every year. But if this happens, we should just have a couple of expansion team over there IMO.

 

 

Quote:So all of this would first assume that the Jaguars would want to move to London.

The reasoning Khan would to move have is highlighted. Or did you not read that far?

 

Do you really think Khan would take that revenue hit? If a team is able to move to London, and the state of the jaguars remains consistent with the last few years, you don't think Khan would feel pressure to move before any others? This would sacrifice local revenue which is essentially what makes the Jaguars able to stay in Jacksonville. But as Khan has stated, the local revenue NEEDS to increase in order to remain stable in Jacksonville.

 

At the end of the day, when we are talking about profitability, owners do NOT care about you. Especially small markets. Moving to a bigger market for an owner would make them forget about you real quick. 

 

I am sorry that this is such a touchy topic. But am i saying anything false? PS I want the Jags to remain in JAX. 

---