Quote:I should have said "probably won't be AS effective" since people will harp on that instead of the overall point. 

 

It's not hard to find guys that have McCaffrey or Mixon or both higher. A ton of "Mixon is the most talented RB in this class" especially. I think with Foreman's looking very impressive today you're going to start seeing quite a bit of "why would you take Fournette early in the 1st when you could have a stylistically similar and athletically superior Foreman on day 2" soon too.

I wasn't talking about Cook or Mixon. I've seen a few people that like one or the other more, sure. But that's changing the topic. Why is Fournette mostly uniformly taken as the first RB? Why is it that all these experts that see the talent are wrong and he's just a one trick pony?

 

I like Foreman but I am skeptical of players that rise quickly due to workouts. He played at 250 and ran his 40 at 230, is there a weight issue there? Why does he go down so easily for such a big back? He's playing against the Big-12. Nobody can stop the run there. I keep seeing him in Round 1. I like him but i still see a gap between him and Fournette. 

---