Quote:But why? How many are you going to keep on your roster? 

 

Why? Because it's the most important position in football. It's as simple as that. And until you find the perfect QB for your franchise, you should always be looking and searching for one. That's probably why this team has only won 43 games since 2008 and why they've just set a record in selecting in the top five overall in the NFL draft for the fifth or sixth straight year in a row. 

 

And as far as how many do we keep on the roster? Obviously a minimum of two. Maybe three depending on the situation and circumstances. You can always groom one up in the stable and look to ship him off down the road if one of your other two quarterbacks makes it work out sooner rather than later. 

 

Right now this team has a gigantic question mark at the QB position. It's been that way for the last ten years. Meanwhile, during this span we've seen other teams hit at the position and move on without any hiccups. Or at least catapult themselves into the middle of the pack when it comes to the competition instead of scrapping by at the bottom of the barrel in a generally weak division. 

 

As I stated originally. I am not saying we take one literally every year. But I do think it would be wise to take one every other year because you never know what's going to happen between injuries, player development, contract negotiations, etc. Look at the Redskins and Cousins situation. Look at San Francisco and Cleveland. Look at our team. Look at the tinhorns in houston. It's an important and critical position to have either secured or constantly competitive. 

 

This team's success has dwindled because poor management in the front office and poor leadership in the coaching field have allowed competition to grow stale and stagnant at, once again, the most critical position in all of football. 

---