Quote:Who said what? Once again, expand on this, share your wisdom with us.

I think he may be trying to imply that Gus isn't that bad, but not brave enough to state it. To which I say, no, Gus was that bad. He was literally the worst coach ever to have as long a tenure as he did. Pete Carrol, Bill Belichek, all had much better first rounds than Gus. Gus will not be coming back to haunt us. He had 4 years, and was terrible pretty much the entire time. Everybody likes Gus, but Mr. Sprinkles is not cut out to be an NFL coach.

 

The only other conclusion I can get is that he is saying that Cleveland hyped Belichek before hiring him. Well Belichek delivered, they went to the playoffs in 3 years, and had a positive point differential even in the 'moving season.' The dumbest thing the Browns/Ravens did was to fire him, just for fresh start sake. The other thing I would point out is all those exaples where before the coaches had their best teams.

 

We have Coughlin after he has already won a bowl. A more app comparison would be the Tuna, Bill Parcells. All the teams he went to improved, quite a bit. They might not have won superbowls, but they were a lot better.

---