As far as a "budget" class firearm, in my mind you can't go wrong with a Taurus.  I recently purchased a .45 ACP PT-1911 that I really like.  Though it's a bit big and bulky for concealed carry purposes, I've so far put about 300 rounds through it (Blazer Brass practice rounds) with no malfunctions.  I primarily carry this when I go out to our property in the country, or when I go fishing or hunting.  I like the stopping power of .45 ACP vs. 9mm, but that's pretty much a personal preference.  My only complaint is that I've had it flip to "safety on" while shooting (a common complaint).  I'm guessing that it has to do with my grip and after-market equipment will probably fix the problem.

 

I also just recently acquired a Kimber Micro 9 that I like for "common carry" purposes.  The only option that I didn't get that I wish I would have is the Crimson Trace grips/sight.  It's a nice, compact weapon that shoots very well.  Though I am a ".45 ACP guy" the 9mm version suits the purpose.

 

Regarding Glock, I have nothing against the brand, but I just don't like the look, feel, etc. of their pistols.  I must say that the Glocks that I have had the opportunity to shoot operated flawlessly, and I certainly wouldn't steer anyone away from them.

 

The bottom line is that it's all about personal preference and what appeals to the owner.  I just like the "classic" look and feel of a good old 1911.

---