I think the guy was making some completely valid points, such as, why does "diversity" not include ideological diversity, and maybe lack of diversity is not simply a result of discrimination. Anyone who reads his so-called "manifesto" can see that it is NOT "anti-diversity." He is simply trying to raise some possible other reasons why women are under-represented in technology.

It seems like every day I read articles about how women are better than men at this or that, but when anyone wants to say men might be better than women at anything, they get attacked.

So often it seems like people try to make up for the lack of a level playing field in the past by tilting the playing field completely in the other direction. They try to make up for past discrimination with more discrimination. Such practices are very destructive to our unity as a society, because now we have created a whole new set of victims and a whole new set of grievances.

---