Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
An Argument Against TE at 29

#21

(04-23-2018, 06:05 PM)JackCity Wrote:
(04-23-2018, 05:30 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: I have no idea how NFL ready Hurst is or isn't but TEs do typically have a longer transition/acclimation period to the NFL as far as I can tell.

Yeah average rookie production is usually low. 
Rookie TEs don't fly up the depth chart as easy as other spots. Even last year's historic crop had mostly minimal impact.

(04-23-2018, 05:46 PM)JaG4LyFe Wrote: Robinson killed it last year. It's amazing that Seattle passed on Robinson with their weak offensive line that they fielded last season.

Pretty hilarious that they passed on Cam AND Lamp..

Just a terrible job self scouting.

Malik McDowell and Micheal Tyson for Cam Robinson...oops.
Your beliefs become your thoughts,
Your thoughts become your words,
Your words become your actions,
Your actions become your habits,
Your habits become your values,
Your values become your destiny.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Messages In This Thread
An Argument Against TE at 29 - by Bullseye - 04-23-2018, 11:46 AM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by NYC4jags - 04-23-2018, 12:11 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JNev - 04-23-2018, 12:38 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by Markulous - 04-23-2018, 12:39 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by knarnn - 04-23-2018, 01:09 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by Markulous - 04-23-2018, 01:22 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by pirkster - 04-23-2018, 12:43 PM
An Argument Against TE at 29 - by Andy G - 04-23-2018, 02:02 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JNev - 04-23-2018, 02:48 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JackCity - 04-23-2018, 03:19 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by NYC4jags - 04-23-2018, 03:42 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JackCity - 04-23-2018, 04:12 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by NYC4jags - 04-23-2018, 04:17 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JackCity - 04-23-2018, 04:27 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by NYC4jags - 04-23-2018, 04:34 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by Markulous - 04-23-2018, 04:57 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JackCity - 04-23-2018, 05:21 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by NYC4jags - 04-23-2018, 05:30 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JackCity - 04-23-2018, 06:05 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JaG4LyFe - 04-23-2018, 08:11 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by JaG4LyFe - 04-23-2018, 05:46 PM
RE: An Argument Against TE at 29 - by Deacon - 04-24-2018, 08:44 AM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!