Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Jaguars interview Mike McCoy for OC

#41

(01-15-2019, 02:14 PM)Jags32250 Wrote: Am I the only one that thinks firing Hackett was a mistake? Thought it was the day they did it and even more now. He called some impressive games over his time on this team with a very flawed offensive roster. It fell apart last year with injuries and Bortles losing his head, no one would have been successful. Offense regressed even more when he left.
(01-15-2019, 02:16 PM)Cleatwood Wrote:
(01-15-2019, 02:14 PM)Jags32250 Wrote: Am I the only one that thinks firing Hackett was a mistake? Thought it was the day they did it and even more now. He called some impressive games over his time on this team with a very flawed offensive roster. It fell apart last year with injuries and Bortles losing his head, no one would have been successful. Offense regressed even more when he left.
I've always thought Hackett was hamstrung by Blake.
(01-15-2019, 02:32 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:
(01-15-2019, 02:14 PM)Jags32250 Wrote: Am I the only one that thinks firing Hackett was a mistake? Thought it was the day they did it and even more now. He called some impressive games over his time on this team with a very flawed offensive roster. It fell apart last year with injuries and Bortles losing his head, no one would have been successful. Offense regressed even more when he left.

I was a Hackett fan until about midseason of this year when it became clear he was not maximizing the potential of the ground game.  He practically refused to run out of multiple personnel groupings. 

He scrapped the one page of the playbook that spread the defense out and gave LF and company more room to run after Grant went down. I think he should have just plugged in Yeldon to Grant's role and continued to run that group of plays as it was the only part of the offense that kept defensive coordinators guessing. 

I defended him up until it was clear he had just scrapped something good and chose to instead telegraph run plays via the personnel groupings against loaded boxes.
He was fine if you look at only 1 week. His main problem is he didn't utilize what worked. He finds something that works, uses it for a game or 2 and then removes it for weeks. Then when injuries happened he goes away from what the players do best and tries to throw it all the time. He just seems like he is trying to outsmart the other team instead of out playing them with the team's strengths.

He had to go because of his own issues, the injuries made it obvious though. A better QB would have hidden it though and he may have stuck around.

Sent from my SM-T820 using Tapatalk
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Messages In This Thread
RE: Jaguars interview Mike McCoy for OC - by p_rushing - 01-15-2019, 11:23 PM
RE: Jaguars interview Mike McCoy for OC - by Jags - 01-16-2019, 02:02 PM



Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!