(02-15-2019, 11:39 AM)Talented Kalamari Wrote:

(02-14-2019, 03:04 PM)TrivialPursuit Wrote: He's the size of a middle school boy.

That's enough for me.

Yeah, because drafting a huge tall QB worked out so well for us last time.. Bortles and Flacco sure are lighting it up in the league, huh? You sound like a child. Quit getting your opinions from analysts and watch the actual game. He's one inch shorter than Russel Wilson, with better speed and a better arm. I'm taking that over Haskins or Foles any day.

---

(02-14-2019, 03:08 PM)TJBender Wrote: I would rather our QB be bigger than a kicker.

Stupid, non football reasons. Analyze him as a Qb then we can talk

You seen him?

He's no where near the size of Russell Wilson. Not even close. It's not just height, although he's 5'8", which is NOT just one 1" shorter than Wilson. He weighs 160lbs at most.

His agent said he's 205? From what? His frame is tiny. Haskins is almost 6'3" and is easily twice the size of Murray in pure shoulder width.. and he weighs 230. 205 is a pipe dream. He is a tiny little man and his frame prohibits him from getting bigger. Mike Vick coming out of Virginia Tech was a monster compared to Murray. Oh and he had better arm strength and was faster...

I'm sure he'll be great the first 5 games... then a DT that is faster and bigger than he ever dreamed possible is going to destroy him.

---