All I've seen thus far is summaries, and those summaries are no doubt colored by the intent of their writers. If true, the thing that bothers me most is that Trump couldn't be said to have obstructed justice solely because the obstructive orders he was giving were being defied by those they were handed down to. If that is actually what the report says (huge if), that's something that should be investigated further. Corpus delecti does not apply in Congressional investigations, and if Trump made repeated, willful attempts to obstruct justice, that's something that needs to be looked into.

Again, huge if.

I've seen something else mentioned to the effect of Donald Trump Jr. not being prosecuted because he didn't know that what he was doing was illegal and didn't directly benefit from it. It does seem odd to me that the report would basically say without saying that the President is an ineffective, clueless figurehead and his son is an idiot. Neither one of those is really a surprise to anyone who's been paying attention to who's leaving the administration and when, but it's weird that would make its way into a special counsel report. Unless, you know, someone said, "Well, if you can't get him on something impeachable, make him look stupid."

---