(03-20-2020, 09:36 AM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(03-19-2020, 10:44 PM)MalabarJag Wrote:
Why are you being such a jerk NYC? You're usually not like that.

I consider myself a BAP drafter, but it's not etched in stone. If the drop off in quality from BAP to a "need" player is large (think Roethlisberger vs. Reggie Williams) then you try to get a good trade value for the slot and player. If you can't get what you think is a fair trade you take the best player, need or not. But if the difference is marginal then go ahead and pick the position you need over the slightly higher rated "box safety."

Personally I consider box safeties a dime a dozen, but that's neither here nor there.

Sorry. 

Just trying to point out some blatant hypocrisy, but the poster has backpedaled miles from his original stance. 

I’ll let it go. 

---

We need: 

CB1 
NT
LT
RG
WR 
TE
FS
c.o.p. RB

you could re-order those a number of ways and it would still make sense and if Yan is traded or sits, add DE

I haven't backpedaled anything.  Your feelings get hurt alot of times when you get proven wrong and realize it. You get real defensive, your feelings get hurt, and you start whining. It's happened a number of times with you and other posters as well.   Just like when you look at the All 22 sometimes and you dont know what you're looking at. Some of the former players break it down for you to finally realize what you're looking at

---

(03-20-2020, 10:25 AM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(03-19-2020, 10:45 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: A few people have already said on here if we take Brown at 9 they dont want Kinlaw at 20 becausewe have bigger needs.  But I do because he will be BPA imo

Having "too many" good DTs is never a bad thing. They rotate more than any position and being creative with the pairings situationally is an asset. 

However, if there's a CB rated similarly to Kinlaw at #20, I'm taking him all day long after landing Brown early. 
Bigger need at a position you typically need to take early to hit. I'd give it precedence.

But it's not the biggest need.  I would still take him at 20 because he would be BPA.  Some GMs that go BPA would take Kinlaw but others would pass like some on this board because we have bigger needs.  Some GMs value need more than others vs BPA whether you want to believe it or not, that's what the Needs vs BPA arguement has always been about for the people that understand the arguement.  I just dont think you are one of them

---