1. Tennessee v. Garner already dictates that you can’t kill someone for only a burglary or certain crimes. Theyd have to classify it as a forcible felony and that’d never hold up in court.

2. He’s saying he wants immunity for people that unintentionally hurt someone unlawfully in the road. I don’t see how anyone would have a problem with that.

3. I don’t think he’s suggesting you can only increase a budget. I think he’s suggesting that if you reduce the budget for political reasons, then you don’t need the funding since you now have newly created money.

---