Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Political meme thread


[Image: demrush.jpeg]
[Image: review.jpg]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


(This post was last modified: 01-01-2023, 08:15 PM by mikesez. Edited 1 time in total.)

(01-01-2023, 01:15 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [Image: 20230101-120932.jpg]

Anyone wanna take a crack at this one?

It's like watching a dog take a turd in your yard and solving for X at the same time. A map to nowhere..

Unless you want to ban people from dressing and identifying as they choose, or allow large employers to discriminate based on gender, there is nothing to be said.  
"I wouldn't do that" or "that makes me uncomfortable" isn't a political statement.
So, if you have nothing political to say, say nothing at all in the political forum.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

(This post was last modified: 01-01-2023, 09:31 PM by NewJagsCity. Edited 4 times in total.)

(01-01-2023, 01:15 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [Image: 20230101-120932.jpg]

Anyone wanna take a crack at this one?

It's like watching a dog take a turd in your yard and solving for X at the same time. A map to nowhere..

The birther in this case still had a uterus. So biologically it was still a female, and it chose to conveniently renonuce its emotional commitment to transgenderism and appropriate the sex that it was assigned all along in order to respond to maternal feelings that it was correctly born with before it made the choice to pervert biology and go down the twisted road of transgenderism.  It renounced transgenderism with this action, and probably doesnt even realize it.  And it is now most likely being lauded as brave and a hero.  For behaving the way it was designed. There is no wrong with this movement. Just self-applied bravery and courage.

And, btw, did i miss something? Doesnt the partner with the [BLEEP] eating grin have any sperm to contribute? Or is that one originally a female? Why was a donor needed?

(01-01-2023, 07:51 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(01-01-2023, 01:15 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [Image: 20230101-120932.jpg]

Anyone wanna take a crack at this one?

It's like watching a dog take a turd in your yard and solving for X at the same time. A map to nowhere..

Unless you want to ban people from dressing and identifying as they choose, or allow large employers to discriminate based on gender, there is nothing to be said.  
"I wouldn't do that" or "that makes me uncomfortable" isn't a political statement.
So, if you have nothing political to say, say nothing at all in the political forum.

This is a political topic, because the advocates of this are making it as such, and thus is fair game for commentary of any kind.
But by all means, please feel free to follow your own advice.
"Remember Red, Hope is a good thing. Maybe the best of things. And no good thing ever dies."  - Andy Dufresne, The Shawshank Redemption
Reply


Mikey is ok with the destruction of norms and definitions as long as he's told it's ok by the right people.
Reply

(This post was last modified: 01-01-2023, 09:39 PM by homebiscuit.)

I think they're both biological females. One is pretending to be male while the other is 'fluid'. So, they had to get the juicy juice from a guy who pretends to be a female.

Maybe? Perhaps?

(01-01-2023, 09:17 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: Mikey is ok with the destruction of norms and definitions as long as he's told it's ok by the right people.

I don't disagree with his point. My only difference is if this bleeds over into demands that everyone participate in their gender charades.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



(01-01-2023, 09:04 PM)NewJagsCity Wrote:
(01-01-2023, 01:15 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [Image: 20230101-120932.jpg]

Anyone wanna take a crack at this one?

It's like watching a dog take a turd in your yard and solving for X at the same time. A map to nowhere..

The birther in this case still had a uterus. So biologically it was still a female, and it chose to conveniently renonuce its emotional commitment to transgenderism and appropriate the sex that it was assigned all along in order to respond to maternal feelings that it was correctly born with before it made the choice to pervert biology and go down the twisted road of transgenderism.  It renounced transgenderism with this action, and probably doesnt even realize it.  And it is now most likely being lauded as brave and a hero.  For behaving the way it was designed. There is no wrong with this movement. Just self-applied bravery and courage.

And, btw, did i miss something? Doesnt the partner with the [BLEEP] eating grin have any sperm to contribute?  Or is that one originally a female?  Why was a donor needed?

(01-01-2023, 07:51 PM)mikesez Wrote: Unless you want to ban people from dressing and identifying as they choose, or allow large employers to discriminate based on gender, there is nothing to be said.  
"I wouldn't do that" or "that makes me uncomfortable" isn't a political statement.
So, if you have nothing political to say, say nothing at all in the political forum.

This is a political topic, because the advocates of this are making it as such, and thus is fair game for commentary of any kind.
But by all means, please feel free to follow your own advice.

How are the adults and child in that Twitter post making their situation a political topic?
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply


(01-01-2023, 09:40 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(01-01-2023, 09:04 PM)NewJagsCity Wrote: The birther in this case still had a uterus. So biologically it was still a female, and it chose to conveniently renonuce its emotional commitment to transgenderism and appropriate the sex that it was assigned all along in order to respond to maternal feelings that it was correctly born with before it made the choice to pervert biology and go down the twisted road of transgenderism.  It renounced transgenderism with this action, and probably doesnt even realize it.  And it is now most likely being lauded as brave and a hero.  For behaving the way it was designed. There is no wrong with this movement. Just self-applied bravery and courage.

And, btw, did i miss something? Doesnt the partner with the [BLEEP] eating grin have any sperm to contribute?  Or is that one originally a female?  Why was a donor needed?


This is a political topic, because the advocates of this are making it as such, and thus is fair game for commentary of any kind.
But by all means, please feel free to follow your own advice.

How are the adults and child in that Twitter post making their situation a political topic?

Go talk about this topic in any other thread, not in the political forum and see what happens..

I dare you.. I double dog dare you. 

Stick your tongue to the frozen pole, Flick..
[Image: SaKG4.gif]
Reply


(01-01-2023, 09:40 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(01-01-2023, 09:04 PM)NewJagsCity Wrote: The birther in this case still had a uterus. So biologically it was still a female, and it chose to conveniently renonuce its emotional commitment to transgenderism and appropriate the sex that it was assigned all along in order to respond to maternal feelings that it was correctly born with before it made the choice to pervert biology and go down the twisted road of transgenderism.  It renounced transgenderism with this action, and probably doesnt even realize it.  And it is now most likely being lauded as brave and a hero.  For behaving the way it was designed. There is no wrong with this movement. Just self-applied bravery and courage.

And, btw, did i miss something? Doesnt the partner with the [BLEEP] eating grin have any sperm to contribute?  Or is that one originally a female?  Why was a donor needed?


This is a political topic, because the advocates of this are making it as such, and thus is fair game for commentary of any kind.
But by all means, please feel free to follow your own advice.

How are the adults and child in that Twitter post making their situation a political topic?

A man CANNOT give birth and a female CANNOT donate sperm.  What part of that don't you understand?
When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.
Reply

(This post was last modified: 01-02-2023, 08:05 AM by mikesez.)

(01-02-2023, 06:57 AM)Sneakers Wrote:
(01-01-2023, 09:40 PM)mikesez Wrote: How are the adults and child in that Twitter post making their situation a political topic?

A man CANNOT give birth and a female CANNOT donate sperm.  What part of that don't you understand?

I understand all of that.  But that's biology,  not politics.
What law do you want to change?

(01-01-2023, 09:43 PM)WingerDinger Wrote:
(01-01-2023, 09:40 PM)mikesez Wrote: How are the adults and child in that Twitter post making their situation a political topic?

Go talk about this topic in any other thread, not in the political forum and see what happens..

I dare you.. I double dog dare you. 

Stick your tongue to the frozen pole, Flick..

People will get touchy and attack each other.  Still doesn't mean it's a political topic.  People get touchy and attacking over religion and sports as well.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Yes, this is how the US government works lately.... They don't work for us anymore, they only work to retain their power over us........

[Image: breaklaw.jpg]
[Image: review.jpg]
Reply


(01-02-2023, 08:04 AM)mikesez Wrote:
(01-02-2023, 06:57 AM)Sneakers Wrote: A man CANNOT give birth and a female CANNOT donate sperm.  What part of that don't you understand?

I understand all of that.  But that's biology,  not politics.
What law do you want to change?


In this case biology is being denied for political reasons.  Stop being a mindless puppet of the Left and start using your brain.  

Here's the headline.  I've run a strikethrough the words that make it political.  "Transgender man gives birth to non-binary partner's baby with female sperm donor."  You just admitted that a man cannot give birth and a female cannot donate sperm.  So, ask yourself, "Why is this even a story?" 

P.S.  The sexual orientation of the partner (or existence of a partner at all) is irrelevant, so why is it even mentioned?
When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.
Reply


(01-02-2023, 08:04 AM)mikesez Wrote:
(01-02-2023, 06:57 AM)Sneakers Wrote: A man CANNOT give birth and a female CANNOT donate sperm.  What part of that don't you understand?

I understand all of that.  But that's biology,  not politics.
What law do you want to change?

(01-01-2023, 09:43 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: Go talk about this topic in any other thread, not in the political forum and see what happens..

I dare you.. I double dog dare you. 

Stick your tongue to the frozen pole, Flick..

People will get touchy and attack each other.  Still doesn't mean it's a political topic.  People get touchy and attacking over religion and sports as well.

Even after a double dog dare..

Wuss..
[Image: SaKG4.gif]
Reply


(01-02-2023, 10:38 AM)Sneakers Wrote:
(01-02-2023, 08:04 AM)mikesez Wrote: I understand all of that.  But that's biology,  not politics.
What law do you want to change?


In this case biology is being denied for political reasons.  Stop being a mindless puppet of the Left and start using your brain.  

Here's the headline.  I've run a strikethrough the words that make it political.  "Transgender man gives birth to non-binary partner's baby with female sperm donor."  You just admitted that a man cannot give birth and a female cannot donate sperm.  So, ask yourself, "Why is this even a story?" 

P.S.  The sexual orientation of the partner (or existence of a partner at all) is irrelevant, so why is it even mentioned?

It's a story because it's provocative and unusual.  What do you want to do about it? Tell the newspaper not to publish the story? I suppose you could boycott them.  In a sense that's what I'm already doing and what you should do too.  Ignore it.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



[Image: 20221230-180521.jpg]
[Image: SaKG4.gif]
Reply

(This post was last modified: 01-02-2023, 01:45 PM by Ronster. Edited 1 time in total.)

(01-02-2023, 08:04 AM)mikesez Wrote:
(01-02-2023, 06:57 AM)Sneakers Wrote: A man CANNOT give birth and a female CANNOT donate sperm.  What part of that don't you understand?

I understand all of that.  But that's biology,  not politics.
What law do you want to change?

(01-01-2023, 09:43 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: Go talk about this topic in any other thread, not in the political forum and see what happens..

I dare you.. I double dog dare you. 

Stick your tongue to the frozen pole, Flick..

People will get touchy and attack each other.  Still doesn't mean it's a political topic.  People get touchy and attacking over religion and sports as well.

#Truth

Except the Democrats made this a political issue. They run on this platform, ergo; political.
"If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you always got"
Reply


(01-02-2023, 11:18 AM)mikesez Wrote:
(01-02-2023, 10:38 AM)Sneakers Wrote: In this case biology is being denied for political reasons.  Stop being a mindless puppet of the Left and start using your brain.  

Here's the headline.  I've run a strikethrough the words that make it political.  "Transgender man gives birth to non-binary partner's baby with female sperm donor."  You just admitted that a man cannot give birth and a female cannot donate sperm.  So, ask yourself, "Why is this even a story?" 

P.S.  The sexual orientation of the partner (or existence of a partner at all) is irrelevant, so why is it even mentioned?

It's a story because it's provocative and unusual.  What do you want to do about it? Tell the newspaper not to publish the story? I suppose you could boycott them.  In a sense that's what I'm already doing and what you should do too.  Ignore it.

Do you take this same approach with your yard during the summer?
"Remember Red, Hope is a good thing. Maybe the best of things. And no good thing ever dies."  - Andy Dufresne, The Shawshank Redemption
Reply


(01-02-2023, 03:06 PM)NewJagsCity Wrote:
(01-02-2023, 11:18 AM)mikesez Wrote: It's a story because it's provocative and unusual.  What do you want to do about it? Tell the newspaper not to publish the story? I suppose you could boycott them.  In a sense that's what I'm already doing and what you should do too.  Ignore it.

Do you take this same approach with your yard during the summer?

If so, it wouldn't be a yard, would be a meadow lolol
[Image: SaKG4.gif]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



(01-02-2023, 03:06 PM)NewJagsCity Wrote:
(01-02-2023, 11:18 AM)mikesez Wrote: It's a story because it's provocative and unusual.  What do you want to do about it? Tell the newspaper not to publish the story? I suppose you could boycott them.  In a sense that's what I'm already doing and what you should do too.  Ignore it.

Do you take this same approach with your yard during the summer?

My yard is my property and my responsibility. 
Other peoples' kids, not in the same way.  I'm not a teacher.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply


You're a puppet.
Reply


(01-02-2023, 11:18 AM)mikesez Wrote:
(01-02-2023, 10:38 AM)Sneakers Wrote: In this case biology is being denied for political reasons.  Stop being a mindless puppet of the Left and start using your brain.  

Here's the headline.  I've run a strikethrough the words that make it political.  "Transgender man gives birth to non-binary partner's baby with female sperm donor."  You just admitted that a man cannot give birth and a female cannot donate sperm.  So, ask yourself, "Why is this even a story?" 

P.S.  The sexual orientation of the partner (or existence of a partner at all) is irrelevant, so why is it even mentioned?

It's a story because it's provocative and unusual.  What do you want to do about it? Tell the newspaper not to publish the story? I suppose you could boycott them.  In a sense that's what I'm already doing and what you should do too.  Ignore it.

A biological woman was impregnated by the sperm of a biological male and gave birth.  How is that provocative or unusual?  It happened 134 million times last year alone worldwide.
When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Invisible User(s), 21 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!