Absolutely not.


I would never support a corrupt, lying sleezeball in Hillary or a maniac in Trump.


You can have your views on people that don't vote but I refuse to exercise my right to vote for the lesser of two evils. I only vote for candidates that I believe in.


As a middle class citizen I'm going to get screwed either way.

We're in the same boat my friend.

---

Absolutely not.

 

I would never support a corrupt, lying sleezeball in Hillary or a maniac in Trump.

 

You can have your views on people that don't vote but I refuse to exercise my right to vote for the lesser of two evils. I only vote for candidates that I believe in.

 

As a middle class citizen I'm going to get screwed either way.

 

There are a few other candidates to choose from. Voting for one of them would make a statement about your opinions; abstaining does not.

---

There are a few other candidates to choose from. Voting for one of them would make a statement about your opinions; abstaining does not.

Abstaining does not? Why? Where is the logic in that? I have valid reasons for not voting for either circus clown.

---

There are a few other candidates to choose from. Voting for one of them would make a statement about your opinions; abstaining does not.

 

I understand the third party candidate vote but in reality this is between the doosh (trump) (if its spelled right it's edited out) vs the turd sandwich (Clinton)...South Park reference if you don't get it. My name, for whatever it's worth, will not be attached to either one.

 

I look forward to 2020 when each party has a chance to put better candidates out there so instead of voting against someone, I can vote for someone.

---

I understand the third party candidate vote but in reality this is between the doosh (trump) (if its spelled right it's edited out) vs the turd sandwich (Clinton)...South Park reference if you don't get it. My name, for whatever it's worth, will not be attached to either one.

 

I look forward to 2020 when each party has a chance to put better candidates out there so instead of voting against someone, I can vote for someone.

 

Only one party will put out a new candidate in 2020 because the incumbent always gets a second nomination.

---

You aren't qualified to have an opinion on any of these topics.

 

You aren't qualified to have an opinion on any of these topics.

 

flsprtsgod v MissJagsFanatic - Clash of Equals!

 

flsprtsgod saying someone is not qualified to have an opinion = irony x 10!

---

The sun's not yellow, it's chicken.

I just wish election night would hurry up and get here.

---

Go Jags!
*To stay up for atleast 2 years 3/6/17
2016 draft players I think will be good

• On the Fournette train, will be best back of his class 3/6/17
  
• Lattimore please,  Lockdowns on both sides would be nice
  
• Engram at TE and the MJD clone Samaje Perine
  

flsprtsgod v MissJagsFanatic - Clash of Equals!

 

flsprtsgod saying someone is not qualified to have an opinion = irony x 10!

Wisecracks about qualifications from someone who can't use the quote and edit buttons properly? You could press clothes with that irony.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

I just wish election night would hurry up and get here.

Me too, the riots are gonna be epic.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

flsprtsgod v MissJagsFanatic - Clash of Equals!

 

flsprtsgod saying someone is not qualified to have an opinion = irony x 10!

 

Does he really think I can still read his posts? That comment is completely useless LOL.

---

Does he really think I can still read his posts? That comment is completely useless LOL.

Who?

---

What?

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

This was not smart.

 

 

Hillary Clinton’s latest mishandling of sensitive information may have occurred before an audience of 70 million.

Speaking at the presidential debate Wednesday night, Clinton noted that it takes four minutes from the time the president makes the call to use nuclear weapons to their actual launch. The remark came amid questions about the fitness of Clinton and GOP candidate Donald Trump to hold the nation’s nuclear codes, but critics, including former intelligence operatives, told Fox News that level of detail about nuclear response times is “protected information.”

“The bottom line on nuclear weapons is that when the president gives the order, it must be followed,” Clinton said. “There’s about four minutes between the order being given and the people responsible for launching nuclear weapons to do so.”

---

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 

I was surprised it takes only four minutes to do that.

---

That's longer than it takes for Donald to achieve "satisfaction" from a random groping.

---

If something can corrupt you, you're corrupted already.
- Bob Marley


 

This was not smart.



Hillary Clinton’s latest mishandling of sensitive information may have occurred before an audience of 70 million.

Speaking at the presidential debate Wednesday night, Clinton noted that it takes four minutes from the time the president makes the call to use nuclear weapons to their actual launch. The remark came amid questions about the fitness of Clinton and GOP candidate Donald Trump to hold the nation’s nuclear codes, but critics, including former intelligence operatives, told Fox News that level of detail about nuclear response times is “protected information.”

“The bottom line on nuclear weapons is that when the president gives the order, it must be followed,” Clinton said. “There’s about four minutes between the order being given and the people responsible for launching nuclear weapons to do so.”

Just because it was news to you doesn't mean this hasn't been cited other places long before Hillary said it.

---

Only a chump boos the home team!

This was not smart.



Hillary Clinton’s latest mishandling of sensitive information may have occurred before an audience of 70 million.

Speaking at the presidential debate Wednesday night, Clinton noted that it takes four minutes from the time the president makes the call to use nuclear weapons to their actual launch. The remark came amid questions about the fitness of Clinton and GOP candidate Donald Trump to hold the nation’s nuclear codes, but critics, including former intelligence operatives, told Fox News that level of detail about nuclear response times is “protected information.”

“The bottom line on nuclear weapons is that when the president gives the order, it must be followed,” Clinton said. “There’s about four minutes between the order being given and the people responsible for launching nuclear weapons to do so.”

Now we just make stuff up.




Can this election cycle please end!

---

Now we just make stuff up.




Can this election cycle please end!

What exactly is made up in what I posted?

---

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 

What exactly is made up in what I posted?

That she in some way gave out protected information.

---

That she in some way gave out protected information.

Maybe that it true, I am not positive about that. Does not change the fact that her mentioning response times is just dumb as hell.

---

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.