Fake news.

But there's a video.....

---

But there's a video.....

All video proof comes from an alternative universe so doesn't count.

---

HAHAHAHAHAHA


hardly.


stahp.


puhlease...

The lack of self awareness and level of hypocrisy on display is absolutely astounding and a testament to the elasticity of the value system of the republican voter.


Absolutely astounding.


If Obama or Hilary or their staff had been responsible for any of these transgressions or screw ups, you people would seething.


It's hilarious.

---

HAHAHAHAHAHA


hardly.


stahp.


puhlease...

The lack of self awareness and level of hypocrisy on display is absolutely astounding and a testament to the elasticity of the value system of the republican voter.


Absolutely astounding.


If Obama or Hilary or their staff had been responsible for any of these transgressions or screw ups, you people would be seething.


It's hilarious.

---

Squawk parrot, squawk!

---

Squawk parrot, squawk!

Is that you on trump's shoulder? Wouldn't be surprised, birdbrain.

---

Is that you on trump's shoulder? Wouldn't be surprised, birdbrain.

Would that make you the little white stain? Dunce.

---

 

She basically was ASKED about these retailers dropping her line, and she said they (business execs) are using her (Ivanka) to get to Trump.

and added "go buy her stuff, its online"

 

 

 

 

But you can't do that.   It's against the rules.   Not a really big deal by itself, but she shouldn't have done it.   Even she admits that. 

---

The lack of self awareness and level of hypocrisy on display is absolutely astounding and a testament to the elasticity of the value system of the republican voter.


Absolutely astounding.


If Obama or Hilary or their staff had been responsible for any of these transgressions or screw ups, you people would be seething.


It's hilarious.

 

That is true. 

 

It's amateur hour in the White House.  Learning on the job.   At least, I hope they're learning.  If they aren't, they won't even last to the end of the first term. 

---

But you can't do that.   It's against the rules.   Not a really big deal by itself, but she shouldn't have done it.   Even she admits that. 

No I agree. And I laugh at any insinuation that I would act differently if it were a democrat.

 

I just have some common sense to know that she wasn't doing it to actually promote sales for profit. She was speaking out as a protest to the actions of some company execs.

 

She was in the wrong. But to start up another witch hunt and sell it as more than it is is comical and typical of the left.

---

No I agree. And I laugh at any insinuation that I would act differently if it were a democrat.


I just have some common sense to know that she wasn't doing it to actually promote sales for profit. She was speaking out as a protest to the actions of some company execs.


She was in the wrong. But to start up another witch hunt and sell it as more than it is is comical and typical of the left.

Yea friggin right.


You are deluding yourself and fooling no one. You would be calling for her head on a platter if this was a democrat responsible.

---

If the right wants to pretend all of these blatant conflicts of interests and obvious attempts to enrich themselves via the office of presidency are not, at a minimum, ethical concerns and just call it fake news that's fine. The right's hypocrisy and ignoring of reality has been on full display since inauguration day so why stop it now right? I mean it's not like you all were worried about someone else's obvious ethical concerns for the past year or so. I expect no consistency in this regard. 

---

No I agree. And I laugh at any insinuation that I would act differently if it were a democrat.

 

I just have some common sense to know that she wasn't doing it to actually promote sales for profit. She was speaking out as a protest to the actions of some company execs.

 

She was in the wrong. But to start up another witch hunt and sell it as more than it is is comical and typical of the left.

lol

 

Sure. Ivanka can't sell her things at Nordstrom so it's just a coincidence that she mentions you can buy her clothes online......

---

Yea friggin right.


You are deluding yourself and fooling no one. You would be calling for her head on a platter if this was a democrat responsible.

Dude you have zero clue.

 

I'm not a Republican lol

 

 

 

I was an avid protester of MANY things done during the "W" era....

And was quite supportive of candidate Obama.

 

 

I don't play the two party game.

So jog on.

---

If the right wants to pretend all of these blatant conflicts of interests and obvious attempts to enrich themselves via the office of presidency are not, at a minimum, ethical concerns and just call it fake news that's fine. The right's hypocrisy and ignoring of reality has been on full display since inauguration day so why stop it now right? I mean it's not like you all were worried about someone else's obvious ethical concerns for the past year or so. I expect no consistency in this regard. 

 

Have you been ignoring the news media the past year and a half? MSM outlets such as NYT, CNN, and WaPo have been consistently churning out blatantly false articles/reports and negative slants on Trump or anything remotely conservative in nature for awhile now. They earned their fake news label this past election. Keep in mind that 9 out of 10 journalists vote Democrat, and they are downright bitter that Queen Hillary didn't ascend the throne. They will do anything to slander and besmirch Trump and the conservative movement, even if it means issuing a retraction shortly after.

 

With that said,

 

Who has been enriched?

---

lol

 

Sure. Ivanka can't sell her things at Nordstrom so it's just a coincidence that she mentions you can buy her clothes online......

C'mon man...

 

I know what she said literally.

But she was not promoting Ivanka's clothing for profit. Firstly, plenty of people got behind Ivanka after this crap (#buyIvanka) without Kellyanne. Secondly, people know if a store doesn't have something teh intrawebz always does.

 

It was choice words she should not have used, I'm with everyone there... but she wasn't trying to sell a brand for profit. 

Sorry. She was trying to say "slag off you corporate cronies, support Ivanka, not these fools"

In support for a presidential family member who she felt is being used as a tool to attack Trump.

And how did the PUBLIC respond?

Nordstrom stock took a nosedive.

 

The shady tactics from the left would be no better if being done by the right.

Every single thing is going to be the next biggest scandal for the next 4 years.

 

Absolutely ridiculous.

---

Have you been ignoring the news media the past year and a half? MSM outlets such as NYT, CNN, and WaPo have been consistently churning out blatantly false articles/reports and negative slants on Trump or anything remotely conservative in nature for awhile now. They earned their fake news label this past election. Keep in mind that 9 out of 10 journalists vote Democrat, and they are downright bitter that Queen Hillary didn't ascend the throne. They will do anything to slander and besmirch Trump and the conservative movement, even if it means issuing a retraction shortly after.


With that said,


Who has been enriched?

Which reports have been blatantly false?

---

Which reports have been blatantly false?

 

The CNN/Buzzfeed dossier, for one.

---

Which reports have been blatantly false?

 

Like ever??

 

The Boston Globe (2004). Fake photos, fake story. The Boston Globe published pictures alleging U.S. troops raped Iraqi women. The pictures turned out to be commercially available pornography. [WorldNetDaily: Boston Globe publishes bogus GI rape pictures (taken from pornographic website).]

 

Jimmy Carter, former U.S. President, Nobel Peace Prize winner and author of Palestine: Peace, Not Apartheid. Lying, plagiarism, bias. His book was so full of errors, including doctored maps, that his chief collaborator Kenneth Stein of Emory University resigned his position with the Carter Center. Carter’s book was condemned by Alan Dershowitz and the Simon Wiesenthal Center, among others. 

 

CBS 60 Minutes, the “Runaway Audi” (1989). Fake footage/manufactured evidence. Drilled a hole in an Audi transmission and pumped in air at high pressure. Viewers didn’t see the drill or the pump – just the doctored car blasting off like a rocket. The story starred a mother who had run over her six-year-old son. On the air, she insisted that she had had her foot on the brake. When her $48 million claim came to court, the investigating police officer and witnesses at the scene testified that after the accident she had admitted that her foot had slipped off the brake. The jury found no defect in the car.

 

Walter Duranty, The New York Times (1930s), Pulitzer Prize winner. Lying. Cisited Stalin’s Russia and wrote that nothing untoward was happening there – even though 10 million people were dying in the Ukraine famine. His writings matched Russian propaganda almost exactly. His Pulitzer Prize still stands.

 

Michael Isikoff, Newsweek (2005). False/unsubstantiated reporting. The Newsweek article claimed that a U.S. interrogator at a Guantanamo Bay had flushed a Koran down the toilet. “Anti-U.S. fanatics seized on the report to stir up riots that have left more than a dozen people dead in Pakistan and Afghanistan.” There is no evidence such a thing ever happened.

 

NBC, Waiting to Explode segment on Dateline NBC (1992). Faking evidence and footage. NBC demonstrated the explosive danger of GM trucks’ gas tanks by showing one actually explode in what appeared to be normal circumstances. In fact, NBC consultants set off explosive miniature rockets beneath the truck split seconds before the crash!

 

You don't think they're willing to pass off whatever to fit their agenda?

 

 

You want me to stick to something more recent and all about Trump?

How about his travel ban that STILL is being pushed as a "Muslim ban", although it allowed thousands of Muslims in during the time it was executed. And didn't target two of the highest Muslim populated countries in the world?

---

Like ever??

 

The Boston Globe (2004). Fake photos, fake story. The Boston Globe published pictures alleging U.S. troops raped Iraqi women. The pictures turned out to be commercially available [BAD WORD REMOVED]. [WorldNetDaily: Boston Globe publishes bogus GI rape pictures (taken from pornographic website).]

 

Jimmy Carter, former U.S. President, Nobel Peace Prize winner and author of Palestine: Peace, Not Apartheid. Lying, plagiarism, bias. His book was so full of errors, including doctored maps, that his chief collaborator Kenneth Stein of Emory University resigned his position with the Carter Center. Carter’s book was condemned by Alan Dershowitz and the Simon Wiesenthal Center, among others. 

 

CBS 60 Minutes, the “Runaway Audi” (1989). Fake footage/manufactured evidence. Drilled a hole in an Audi transmission and pumped in air at high pressure. Viewers didn’t see the drill or the pump – just the doctored car blasting off like a rocket. The story starred a mother who had run over her six-year-old son. On the air, she insisted that she had had her foot on the brake. When her $48 million claim came to court, the investigating police officer and witnesses at the scene testified that after the accident she had admitted that her foot had slipped off the brake. The jury found no defect in the car.

 

Walter Duranty, The New York Times (1930s), Pulitzer Prize winner. Lying. Cisited Stalin’s Russia and wrote that nothing untoward was happening there – even though 10 million people were dying in the Ukraine famine. His writings matched Russian propaganda almost exactly. His Pulitzer Prize still stands.

 

Michael Isikoff, Newsweek (2005). False/unsubstantiated reporting. The Newsweek article claimed that a U.S. interrogator at a Guantanamo Bay had flushed a Koran down the toilet. “Anti-U.S. fanatics seized on the report to stir up riots that have left more than a dozen people dead in Pakistan and Afghanistan.” There is no evidence such a thing ever happened.

 

NBC, Waiting to Explode segment on Dateline NBC (1992). Faking evidence and footage. NBC demonstrated the explosive danger of GM trucks’ gas tanks by showing one actually explode in what appeared to be normal circumstances. In fact, NBC consultants set off explosive miniature rockets beneath the truck split seconds before the crash!

 

You don't think they're willing to pass off whatever to fit their agenda?

 

 

You want me to stick to something more recent and all about Trump?

How about his travel ban that STILL is being pushed as a "Muslim ban", although it allowed thousands of Muslims in during the time it was executed. And didn't target two of the highest Muslim populated countries in the world?

 

Jesus Christ, is that all you've got from the last 100 years?   That's nothing.   Trump tells more lies than that in one day! 

---