The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Bradley says Henne our starter even if we draft QB at 3
|
While I'm sure it will be a competition but this is still depressing to hear.
![]() We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:Nobody expects that. Then why are people surprised? Because Bradley said it instead of it being understood already? Henne is the starter going into camp. There are two possible outcomes after that. The rookie QB beats out Henne and starts week one or Henne beats out the rookie QB and starts week one If Henne is the starter, you probably have the wrong QB.
;
;
Quote:Then why are people surprised? Because Bradley said it instead of it being understood already? ^This
Leftwich was scheduled to be the starter too...
So was Garrard... Matt Flynn was signed to be Seattle's starter too...Until the rookie beat him out.
Making up
Evidence Depending on Information Available
Quote:Then why are people surprised? Because Bradley said it instead of it being understood already? Or somebody else beats out Henne. I thought Bradley was all about competition, turns out maybe that was all lip service. If he were really focused on competition and getting better he'd have just said Henne will come in and try to win the job again like everyone else and the team wanted him in the competition. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:Or somebody else beats out Henne. I am sure if Matt Scott goes to camp and outperforms everyone, he will be the starter. And if I grow a foot, I could play in the NBA.
;
; Quote:Damn man, I wonder if he would like to kick me in my beanbags as well. LMBO... If you had a Marble Sack it would sound a Lil Better... NH3...
"AZANE"
Quote:Then why are people surprised? Because Bradley said it instead of it being understood already? Because there's no point at this point to say "Henne will be our starter even if we draft a QB at 3!" If he had said "If we draft a QB -- no matter where it is, they're going to have to win the job." That'd have made sense. But saying that Henne is going to be the starter even if we draft a QB either has absolutely no meaning at all or means that the Rookie isn't going to be able to win the starting job week 1.
I was wrong about Trent Baalke.
He means that the rookie will have to beat out the incumbent starter in camp, as it should be. No real news here unless your a doom and gloom type individual like certain people on this board.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
The ticket offices are now receiving what they call "the Henne bump" as renewals are skyrocketing. If you get a busy signal, don't give up.
Only a chump boos the home team!
It seems as if we're going for a Play Maker within the first round or two while potentially targeting a QB in round three if it presents itself... Can you also say Smoke Screen?
NH3...
"AZANE"
Quote:Because there's no point at this point to say "Henne will be our starter even if we draft a QB at 3!" Is that even what he said?
;
;
Quote:I am sure if Matt Scott goes to camp and outperforms everyone, he will be the starter. And if I grow a foot, I could play in the NBA. Do you really need three of them? We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:The ticket offices are now receiving what they call "the Henne bump" as renewals are skyrocketing. If you get a busy signal, don't give up. hahahhahaha, thats actually pretty funny
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:Is there a link to this? What kinda link you want? They have maple flavored, spicy and original..
Geeezusss. Relax. Most teams still prefer to groom a rookie QB. There isn't a Luck in this draft. The majority are not ready for the transition. It ruined Gabbert. Luck looked like a rookie many times. RG didn't fare as well as Rouge Epidermis team would have liked.
The top 3 QBs are no where near NFL ready. That is why. IF for the unlikely scenario the team drafts Johnny, then maybe. He can use his mobility, wereas the others would get killed with this line, doing to their timing no favors. Playoffs this year are a reach. The FO is in no hurry. The Colts and Texans, who will rebound, are ahead of us. My two cents.
Blakes Life Matters
Quote:Geeezusss. Relax. Most teams still prefer to groom a rookie QB. There isn't a Luck in this draft. The majority are not ready for the transition. It ruined Gabbert. Luck looked like a rookie many times. RG didn't fare as well as Rouge Epidermis team would have liked. Sorry but playing Gabbert early isn't what ruined him. If he would have sat the bench it just would have delayed the inevitable. |
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.