Bridgewater or Manziel at #3 and I'll be happy.  I'd be cool with trading back into the first and getting Bortles late.

---

Keep in touch on Facebook: WE ARE JAGUARS

Bridgewater or Manziel at #3 and I'll be happy.  I'd be cool with trading back into the first and getting Bortles late.

 

I'd be happy in this order

 

1. Bridgewater

2. Clowney

3. Manziel

4. Bortles

---

Seriously?

 

Need citations for our posts now?

Damm....this posting on message boards is getting complicated. (-:

---

Khan told me they are taking Clowney if he drops to them.....

---

"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot."

Bridgewater in round one and Murray in round five, please.

---

Should have just linked to twitter.

 

Anyway... that sounds like good news.  Can you imagine if we actually have good QB play next year?  Add some pass rush, a run game, and improve the interior line... 6-10 would be very achievable

---

I was wrong about Trent Baalke. 

If Clowney is what you say he is, he's a Texan.


If Sideshow Khan is the man you say he is, Teddy or Johnny or Biff is a Jaguar.


Now if the NFL can jiggle the schedule for Jacksonville @ Houston for week one...


Once Watt, Cushing and Clowney are done, Teddy or Johnny is a greasy spot on the Texans turf.


The one exception is Biff will be a twitching greasy spot on the Texans' turf.


Then what?

 

The Texans aren't made of paper. Even if the Jaguars can land Jake Matthews, providing us a second, elite franchise tackle, we might be able to keep a passer upright just long enough for the pocket to collapse inside.

 

Small ball is the Fisch philosophy. 

 

Good luck with that.

---

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. - Mahatma Gandhi

 

http://s6.postimg.org/vyr2ycdfz/Teddy_Br...cked_4.gif

I heard him talking in his sleep.......he kept mumbling......,Watson.....Watson......Watson

---

Should have just linked to twitter.

 

Anyway... that sounds like good news.  Can you imagine if we actually have good QB play next year?  Add some pass rush, a run game, and improve the interior line... 6-10 would be very achievable

 

6-10 should be achievable with the guys already on the roster if everyone else around them improves. If we get an elite prospect (assuming there is one in this draft) the team instantly hits .500 and only goes up from there.

---

I'd be happy in this order

 

1. Bridgewater

2. Clowney

3. Manziel

4. Bortles

 

Swap 3 and 4 and that's my list.

---

What does the Fox say?

"Show me the carfax"

---

Binky the king-maker. Biff! Biff! Biff!

---

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. - Mahatma Gandhi

 

http://s6.postimg.org/vyr2ycdfz/Teddy_Br...cked_4.gif

i seriously don't think he was trying to pawn that off as his.


He is quoting something khan said. No big deal. I would only want a link to back up that shad actually said it.

 

No, he copied and pasted his entire post from something someone else wrote, and he didn't attribute it to the actual writer, thus implying that he wrote it himself.  

---

Seriously?

 

Need citations for our posts now?

 

If you didn't write that post, if you just copied and pasted the entire thing from an article you found on the internet, darn right you should cite the source, and put the entire post in quotes.   I'm amazed that anyone would question that.   Good God, you do not just copy and paste someone else's work as if it was your own.  

---

I'd be happy in this order

 

1. Bridgewater

2. Clowney

3. Manziel

4. Bortles

my list

 

1.Clowney

2.Dee Ford

4 S Watkins

5. A Barr

---

Khan told me they are taking Clowney if he drops to them.....

Sure he did 

---

No, he copied and pasted his entire post from something someone else wrote, and he didn't attribute it to the actual writer, thus implying that he wrote it himself.  

You're an idiot

---

No, he copied and pasted his entire post from something someone else wrote, and he didn't attribute it to the actual writer, thus implying that he wrote it himself.

If it was a quote from shad khan, how can anyone take that as credit for themselves?? Doesn't matter where he got the info as long as it's quoted from shad khan. No one can claim credit for khans words, unless your suggesting you think shad told this directly to the original poster.

---

If you didn't write that post, if you just copied and pasted the entire thing from an article you found on the internet, darn right you should cite the source, and put the entire post in quotes.   I'm amazed that anyone would question that.   Good God, you do not just copy and paste someone else's work as if it was your own.  

 

To your point, from the board rules:

You agree not to post full text articles on the message board from Jaguars.com or any other source. You agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you. When posting on the message board, remember to give credit to the authorship and Copyright of any references or articles that are linked to and/or included in said post, and take note of any "Copyright," "All Rights Reserved" or similar Notices on Website Pages/Articles.

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

You're an idiot

 

Not really.  There are rules.  Try reading them. 

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.