The reporter who actually has the sources is Catherine Herridge, and while you can certainly dismiss the sources, I'm pretty sure she's got rock solid info as she always has. I know you need to dismiss it since you're a shill for Hill, but your little house of cards is coming down pretty quickly. Flail away.

Sources tell you that?


At this point HRC is still the favorite to win. Trump is back in the game, but would still be a long shot. So I will hold my flail.

---

Sources tell you that?


And at this point HRC is still the favorite to win. Trump is s back in the game but would still be a long shot. So I will hold my flail.

 

You'll have plenty of time to whine and flail on Wednesday when you're trying to figure out what happened.

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

You'll have plenty of time to whine and flail on Wednesday when you're trying to figure out what happened.

I am damn confident who is going to win! Enough I dropped some cash to Bodog.

<a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/11/02/fbi_sources_tell_fox_news_indictment_likely_in_clinton_foundation_case.html'>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/11/02/fbi_sources_tell_fox_news_indictment_likely_in_clinton_foundation_case.html</a>


Let the spinning begin.

No need for spin. Nice try Foxnews

<a class="bbc_url" href='https://www.google.com/amp/abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/trumps-claims-evidence-fbis-clinton-foundation-probe-impressive/story%3Fid%3D43282736?client=safari'>https://www.google.com/amp/abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/trumps-claims-evidence-fbis-clinton-foundation-probe-impressive/story%3Fid%3D43282736?client=safari</a>

---

Indictments likely...


Been hearing that by repub mouthpieces since 2008 to keep suckers engaged. NOT GONNA HAPPEN.

---

I am damn confident who is going to win! Enough I dropped some cash to Bodog.



No need for spin. Nice try Foxnews

<a class="bbc_url" href='https://www.google.com/amp/abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/trumps-claims-evidence-fbis-clinton-foundation-probe-impressive/story%3Fid%3D43282736?client=safari'>https://www.google.com/amp/abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/trumps-claims-evidence-fbis-clinton-foundation-probe-impressive/story%3Fid%3D43282736?client=safari</a>

Doh (the political appointees) have been stonewalling for a year to protect their nominee. Its no surprise. The surprise is that anyone can deny the obvious conflicts of interest. Abedin was being paid by state, the foundation and a Clinton bundled for crying out loud.

---

Lets walk it on back fellas...

 

Fox anchor Bret Baier on Clinton ‘indictment’ report: ‘It was a mistake, and for that I’m sorry’

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-...-wont-die/

---

;

;

It was a mistake because it assumes the doj would follow the evidence despite 36 to one allegiance to Clinton.

---

Lets walk it on back fellas...

Fox anchor Bret Baier on Clinton ‘indictment’ report: ‘It was a mistake, and for that I’m sorry’

<a class="bbc_url" href='https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/04/fox-news-report-of-likely-indictment-in-clinton-case-just-wont-die/'>https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/04/fox-news-report-of-likely-indictment-in-clinton-case-just-wont-die/</a>

Boom. Called it yet again

---

The only way there will be an indictment is if Trump wins.  The DoJ will stonewall this until the end of time under the current administration and certainly dismiss should she win.

---

Original Season Ticket Holder - Retired  1995 - 2020


At some point you just have to let go of what you thought should happen and live in what is happening.
 

The only way there will be an indictment is if Trump wins. The DoJ will stonewall this until the end of time under the current administration and certainly dismiss should she win.

Exactly

---

The only way there will be an indictment is if Trump wins.  The DoJ will stonewall this until the end of time under the current administration and certainly dismiss should she win.

 

Agreed.  If she wins, Obama will make it like this never existed before he leaves office.

 

Fox News clearly raced to break a story that wasn't fully cooked yet.  They're usually pretty good about avoiding pratfalls like this, but with the election news flying in at such a rapid rate, they jumped the gun.  Kudos to Baier for at least coming out and admitting the mistake quickly.  If it turns out to be accurate, he still got the scoop.

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Lets walk it on back fellas...

 

Fox anchor Bret Baier on Clinton ‘indictment’ report: ‘It was a mistake, and for that I’m sorry’

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-...-wont-die/

 

 

Boom. Called it yet again

 

Unless I'm reading it wrong, he's only saying that he shouldn't have said it would be likely since, despite having sufficient evidence, it doesn't mean it'll lead to an indictment. 

 

That doesn't mean there wont be an indictment or that he was wrong on his initial comment, only that the process doesn't mean evidence = indictment.

 

Maybe I read it differently but that was my interpretation. 

---

Ahem well there goes that.

---

Thank goodness for a corrupt system. Otherwise your girl might actually be held accountable for her scum baggery.

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Boom. Called it yet again

I can't miss.

---

Thank goodness for a corrupt system.

-D Trump on how he earns money.

---

Unless I'm reading it wrong, he's only saying that he shouldn't have said it would be likely since, despite having sufficient evidence, it doesn't mean it'll lead to an indictment.


That doesn't mean there wont be an indictment or that he was wrong on his initial comment, only that the process doesn't mean evidence = indictment.


Maybe I read it differently but that was my interpretation.

Yeah... nope.


Turn off Fox News

---

Thank goodness for a corrupt system. Otherwise your girl might actually be held accountable for her scum baggery.

Or get credit for her lack thereof. Nah - not around here.

---

Unless I'm reading it wrong, he's only saying that he shouldn't have said it would be likely since, despite having sufficient evidence, it doesn't mean it'll lead to an indictment. 

 

That doesn't mean there wont be an indictment or that he was wrong on his initial comment, only that the process doesn't mean evidence = indictment.

 

Maybe I read it differently but that was my interpretation. 

 

So when I say a giant asteroid is about to hit the earth, what I really meant was, someday a giant asteroid might hit the earth. 

---