Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Day and Strong waived

#21

Drafting Day over Dak Prescott looks even worse now
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#22

I thought Day was disruptive as hell when he got a chance to play. Has to be something else up with this.
You either die as a good poster, or live long enough to become the troll.
Reply

#23

(11-18-2017, 01:15 PM)HolsterHusto Wrote: Drafting Day over Dak Prescott looks even worse now

You can say that for 31 other teams in the NFL as well. Nobody thought Dak would be as good as he is. Not even the Cowboys or they would have drafted him higher. Sometimes, players just surprise you ala Tom Brady.
Reply

#24

(11-18-2017, 01:31 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote:
(11-18-2017, 01:15 PM)HolsterHusto Wrote: Drafting Day over Dak Prescott looks even worse now

You can say that for 31 other teams in the NFL as well. Nobody thought Dak would be as good as he is. Not even the Cowboys or they would have drafted him higher. Sometimes, players just surprise you ala Tom Brady.

what makes it worse was we coached him in the Senior Bowl and we supposedly high on him.
Reply

#25

Strong sucks but Day is an odd cut. There are worse players on the roster than Day, like Smoot.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#26

Wow that is really a surprise.
Reply

#27

News flash-our front office is not very good at scouting the quarterback position.
Respect the game.  Play with a sense of urgency. 


1.)  Take care of the ball.  Win the turnover battle.

2.)  It's all about 3rd down.  Win on 3rd down to win the game.

3.) Playmakers make plays.  The only reason that you put your uniform on is to make plays. In order to EARN your paycheck, you must make plays.  

Learn from the great collapse of 2023.  
Reply

#28

(11-18-2017, 01:06 PM)JackCity Wrote:
(11-18-2017, 12:58 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: Cut Day I dont think had anything to do with his play on the field or our depth.   He has played well every chance he has gotten, has to be something more behind closed doors.  Maybe he wasnt happy when we signed Dareus?  Hopefully it comes out

Nah it's just a depth and personnel move. Apparently he didn't fit what Hobby wanted at 3 tech. Already have Malik, Dareus, Calais, Abry who can play at 3 tech, Ankou can moonlight there also.

Seems like they just didn't think Day added any value at other spots to make him worth it. I disagree but whatever

Link?
Reply

#29

Not really surprised. We can expect more of theses good players getting released as time goes. It’s about constantly upgrading and other times game day necessary casualties.
[Image: Ben-Roethlisberger_Lerentee-McCary-Sack_...ayoffs.jpg]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#30

What lol. We were not drafting Prescott after Blake’s 35 td 4400 yard season lol
Reply

#31

Time for the monster DeDe to hit the turf.
Reply

#32

(11-18-2017, 02:00 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:
(11-18-2017, 01:06 PM)JackCity Wrote: Nah it's just a depth and personnel move. Apparently he didn't fit what Hobby wanted at 3 tech. Already have Malik, Dareus, Calais, Abry who can play at 3 tech, Ankou can moonlight there also.

Seems like they just didn't think Day added any value at other spots to make him worth it. I disagree but whatever

Link?

Mike K.
Reply

#33

Seems like a TC move. Coughlin doesn't like smaller DTs and knows he will be a liability against the run
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#34

(11-18-2017, 02:18 PM)Etdavis2006 Wrote: What lol. We were not drafting Prescott after Blake’s 35 td 4400 yard season lol

And look how that turned out lol
Reply

#35

(11-18-2017, 02:32 PM)JackCity Wrote:
(11-18-2017, 02:00 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: Link?

Mike K.

He said, "I don't think his strengths fit what Marion Hobby wanted in a three-tech." 

His opinion is no more than anyone elses.  He has no clue what goes on behind closed doors or if Coughlin wants bigger DT's that can hold up against the run
Reply

#36

Called it in an earlier thread we were talking Dede in, just so many bodies on the D Line he was the odd man out. Not all that shocking when you pick up a guy mid season and its already the most crowded position on the team. 

With Cole and Mickens making plays out there Strong is another easy move.


If Day is not claimed off of waivers I would be shocked, dude can ball.
Reply

#37

I think Cle. will claim him. I think would be a perfect fit on their dline and they get first dibs
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#38

(11-18-2017, 02:47 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:
(11-18-2017, 02:32 PM)JackCity Wrote: Mike K.

He said, "I don't think his strengths fit what Marion Hobby wanted in a three-tech." 

His opinion is no more than anyone elses.  He has no clue what goes on behind closed doors or if Coughlin wants bigger DT's that can hold up against the run

Common sense would say it's simply because we have so many people who play 3 tech and they don't feel Day adds as much in our other areas. Doesn't seem to be any off the field stuff. Agreed that Kaye is only speaking opinion wise there.
Reply

#39

(11-18-2017, 02:54 PM)JackCity Wrote:
(11-18-2017, 02:47 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: He said, "I don't think his strengths fit what Marion Hobby wanted in a three-tech." 

His opinion is no more than anyone elses.  He has no clue what goes on behind closed doors or if Coughlin wants bigger DT's that can hold up against the run

Common sense would say it's simply because we have so many people who play 3 tech and they don't feel Day adds as much in our other areas. Doesn't seem to be any off the field stuff. Agreed that Kaye is only speaking opinion wise there.
I was gonna post the definition of the word think but I figured you could look it up.  Common sense would tell me Tom is in the house now and Day doesn't have the size in what Tom likes in his DTs.  May not be any off the field stuff or if he was upset at bringing in Dareus but nobody knows for sure
Reply

#40

(11-18-2017, 02:18 PM)Etdavis2006 Wrote: What lol. We were not drafting Prescott after Blake’s 35 td 4400 yard season lol

We drafted Brandon Allen after that season. I personally think we were waiting until the 5th/6th round to draft Prescott, but obviously he didn't fall that far.
Reply




Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!