Are you as clueless in things in life that actually matter as your are in here?

Not sure you can legitimately consider yourself as a person who decides what matters and doesn't.


But I can see you have learned well from Trump. Just name call, denigrate, throw a tantrum and act like a child. Kudos Sir! You are an excellent student of Breitbart University.

---

Not sure you can legitimately consider yourself as a person who decides what matters and doesn't.

But I can see you have learned well from Trump. Just name call, denigrate, throw a tantrum and act like a child. Kudos Sir! You are an excellent student of Breitbart University.

What does Trump and how he acts have anything to do with Hillary and her emails? I believe they call this a deflection...

---

What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???

What does Trump and how he acts have anything to do with Hillary and her emails? I believe they call this a deflection...

What in the world are you talking about? Now you just make stuff up.

---

What in the world are you talking about? Now you just make stuff up.

You are very salty right now....lol

---

What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???

[quote name="Indy2Jax" post="872566" timestamp="1477665553"]


Easily manipulated if one wanted. It's why there will never be a criminal investigation. This proves no wrong doing and is hearsay.[/quote?]


It's them danged Russians!

---

You are very salty right now....lol

 

The kid is a real life walking billboard for the left.

---

You are very salty right now....lol

You need to play by the rules: accusations against Trump are automatically true. Accusations against Hillary need deep investigation.

---

You need to play by the rules: accusations against Trump are automatically true. Accusations against Hillary need deep investigation.

I keep forgetting that!!

---

What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???

You need to play by the rules: accusations against Trump are automatically true. Accusations against Hillary need deep investigation.

 

Indy is still sticking with the WikiLinks stuff being doctored even though the campaign has denied nothing outside of Donna Brazile lying through her teeth.

---

Indy is still sticking with the WikiLinks stuff being doctored even though the campaign has denied nothing outside of Donna Brazile lying through her teeth.

I never said they were doctored. How do I know they're not is all I asked.


The only way to verify that is for Assange and the hackers to step forward as part of the investigation process.

---

I never said they were doctored. How do I know they're not is all I asked.


The only way to verify that is for Assange and the hackers to step forward as part of the investigation process.

 

Do you believe them or not?

---

I never said they were doctored. How do I know they're not is all I asked.


The only way to verify that is for Assange and the hackers to step forward as part of the investigation process.

 

Does alien life need to step forward to prove it's existence or is just plain old human common sense enough?

 

The Clinton campaign NOT denying it IS admitting guilt, no?

---

The Clinton campaign NOT denying it IS admitting guilt, no?

That's very untrue! Silence is not guilt

Do you believe them or not?

Maybe. I think the selective release of them is somewhat fishy. It feels like they are trying to force people into a preconceived opinion.


I think the process of realeasing then is just as manipulative as they're claiming the HRC campaign to be.

---

Not sure you can legitimately consider yourself as a person who decides what matters and doesn't.


But I can see you have learned well from Trump. Just name call, denigrate, throw a tantrum and act like a child. Kudos Sir! You are an excellent student of Breitbart University.

And you've learned well from the House of Soros.  Avoid facts, focus on anything that distracts from said facts, and complain that the opposition is a big bunch of meanies.  

 

That's very untrue! Silence is not guilt


Maybe. I think the selective release of them is somewhat fishy. It feels like they are trying to force people into a preconceived opinion.


I think the process of realeasing then is just as manipulative as they're claiming the HRC campaign to be.

Any lack of denial from any party involved is a tacit admission that these emails were not doctored.  

 

There's nothing fishy about it.  They've been pretty clear all along that they were going to slowly release the emails leading up to the election so that the narrative remained in the media cycle and wasn't buried as negative stories about the mainstream media's chosen candidate usually are.  

 

You call it manipulative.  I call it strategic.  WikiLeaks knew that if they just shot their wad and dumped all of the emails a month ago, the Clinton media would have ground it up and buried it then in order to protect their candidate.  Pretty hard to ignore a slow trickle of damning evidence showing just how corrupt the Clintons are.  

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

And you've learned well from the House of Soros. Avoid facts, focus on anything that distracts from said facts, and complain that the opposition is a big bunch of meanies.


Any lack of denial from any party involved is a tacit admission that these emails were not doctored.


There's nothing fishy about it. They've been pretty clear all along that they were going to slowly release the emails leading up to the election so that the narrative remained in the media cycle and wasn't buried as negative stories about the mainstream media's chosen candidate usually are.


You call it manipulative. I call it strategic. WikiLeaks knew that if they just shot their wad and dumped all of the emails a month ago, the Clinton media would have ground it up and buried it then in order to protect their candidate. Pretty hard to ignore a slow trickle of damning evidence showing just how corrupt the Clintons are.

Early voting is looking extremely good for Hillary.

---

Early voting is looking extremely good for Hillary.

Tell yourself whatever you need to in order to keep that dreamy vision of her in your mind.  

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Tell yourself whatever you need to in order to keep that dreamy vision of her in your mind.

You putting it out there for matter of record?


You believe Donald Trump will win?

---

Early voting is looking extremely good for Hillary.

 

You gotta feel like you just got kicked in the junk with this latest news.

---

You gotta feel like you just got kicked in the junk with this latest news.

Not really. It's too late. I don't believe there is a single undecided at this point. Limbaugh has an interesting take on the new news.

---

You putting it out there for matter of record?


You believe Donald Trump will win?

I don't think he's lost this election yet.  I think it's even odds at this point,  but when the princess is hemorrhaging support in polls as election day draws closer, it's starting to look a lot less like this landslide you and the rest of the Clinton fan boys were expecting, and more like a scramble to get Hillary's lawyers out there to challenge the election results.  Of course, we'd know what her intentions would be should the results favor Trump, but they didn't ask her that question.  

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.