Coughlin drafted Garrard,  correct?

That is correct.  Why do you ask?

Was trying to get a grasp on what Coughlin likes because I read that he follows the Parcell rating system but Garrard doesn't fit that mold especially with the completion percentage he had in college. Just trying to find a little hope lol.

---

That is correct.  Why do you ask?

Was trying to get a grasp on what Coughlin likes because I read that he follows the Parcell rating system but Garrard doesn't fit that mold especially with the completion percentage he had in college. Just trying to find a little hope lol.

To be clear, here is a link detailing the Parcells QB Rating System and how it applies to this year's rookie QBs...

https://scout.com/nfl/browns/Board/10532...-113440836

---

 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!

NFL: Move The Sticks With Daniel Jeremiah and Bucky Brooks podcast has an episode up all about Lamar Jackson. It's pretty interesting and makes you fan of him.

His HS coach mentioned that Lamar is self-made and his mother drove him to individual QB camps on the weekends. You can definitely get a grasp of his work ethic from his year to year improvement. He seems like his completely dedicated to football.

---

Not a huge fan of Jackson but if he's there when we pick in the 2nd might be hard to pass up.
I assume you meant Andrews in the first and Jackson in the 2nd.

I would not select Jackson at 29, personally.

I think Andrews has lost his luster in terms of a first round pick considering his medical. I think we're trading up for a QB. Does anyone know if our first 3 picks equal close to the 14th pick? We need to get there to have a shot at a top QB IMO.

---

Your beliefs become your thoughts,
Your thoughts become your words,
Your words become your actions,
Your actions become your habits,
Your habits become your values,
Your values become your destiny.

Not a huge fan of Jackson but if he's there when we pick in the 2nd might be hard to pass up.
I assume you meant Andrews in the first and Jackson in the 2nd.

I would not select Jackson at 29, personally.

I think Andrews has lost his luster in terms of a first round pick considering his medical. I think we're trading up for a QB. Does anyone know if our first 3 picks equal close to the 14th pick? We need to get there to have a shot at a top QB IMO.

With the caveat that you have to take trade value charts with a grain of salt, here is one by drafttek.

https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp

According to that one, the Packers pick #14 is worth 1100 points.

Per the same chart, our pick #29 is worth 640 points, for a difference of 460 points.

To make up the difference, using picks from this year's draft only, the Jaguars would have to give up the 2nd round pick, #61 overall (292 points), the 3rd round pick, #93 overall (128) and a 4th round pick, #129 overall (43 points).

640+292+128+43=1103 points.

Keep in mind, due to the Dareus trade, we don't have a 5th round pick this year.

For additional context, the Chiefs made a similar move last year, trading up from 27th overall to 10th overall, surrendering a 3rd round pick last year and this year's first.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/draft2017/story/...ck-mahomes

Making the argument that the team is moving up fewer slots in this scenario-15 slots vs 17 slots- and is not trading into the top ten like the chiefs did last year, perhaps the cost would not be as high.

Examining a more recent trade-also involving the Bills-the Bills traded the 21st overall pick and LT Cordy Glenn to Cincinnati for the #12 overall selection.  So they gave up their first round pick plus a still in his prime LT (a premium position) to move up 9 spots.

Maybe a swap of firsts plus Fowler gets us to 14.

(Note-I do not want to see the team trade Fowler if at all possible, but given the Packers' need for a pass rusher, our presumptive desire for a QB for the purposes of this discussion, and the depth and talent at DE, Fowler seemed a logical trade inducement)

---

 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!