Honest question, since when did volume of charitable contributions become a requirement to become President? I don't care that 96% of Hillary's charitable donations went to her own foundation, or that The Clinton Foundation only gives 6% to charity.

 

It is hard for me to even care who it goes to as long as it doesn't result in political back-scratching or kick-backs.

---

Thoughts?

Theory - Hillary is a lizard person from Dargon III. Make as much sense.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Honest question, since when did volume of charitable contributions become a requirement to become President? I don't care that <a class="bbc_url" href='http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/12/96-percent-of-hillarys-charitable-donations-in-2015-went-to-clinton-foundation/'>96% of Hillary's charitable donations</a> went to her own foundation, or that <a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.breitbart.com/radio/2016/09/22/clinton-cash-author-peter-schweizer-confirms-clinton-foundation-gives-only-six-percent-charity/'>The Clinton Foundation only gives 6% to charity.</a>

 

It is hard for me to even care who it goes to as long as it doesn't result in political back-scratching or kick-backs.

Its not Hillary's donations that are the kick backs, that's all the others. Hers are just simple tax avoidance so she doesn't have to pay her fair share.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Honest question, since when did volume of charitable contributions become a requirement to become President? I don't care that <a class="bbc_url" href='http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/12/96-percent-of-hillarys-charitable-donations-in-2015-went-to-clinton-foundation/'>96% of Hillary's charitable donations</a> went to her own foundation, or that <a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.breitbart.com/radio/2016/09/22/clinton-cash-author-peter-schweizer-confirms-clinton-foundation-gives-only-six-percent-charity/'>The Clinton Foundation only gives 6% to charity.</a>


It is hard for me to even care who it goes to as long as it doesn't result in political back-scratching or kick-backs.

Uhh... That 6% thing is a lie. You're being played as a sucker if you believe that garbage.


As to why it matters if the wealthy are giving to charities... Well... If you want to pay 0 in taxes and not provide welfare or social programs, how are we gonna sweep all the dead and starving lowlife scum into the mass graves?

---