The left also thinks “freedom” is a trigger word, let that sink in. If you are for freedom, you’re probably a racist

---

"If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you always got"

Still waiting, Mikey.

---

Still waiting, Mikey.

The burden of research or scholarship is always on the one making the outlandish claim, or the one asking for money. 
The old onus on the anus rule. 
My claim that the traditional values of the commonwealth of Virginia call for the segregation of races is self evidently true.  
And my claim about socialism being defined by government ownership of the means of production is almost verbatim from the dictionary.  
Your claims to the contrary are extraordinary, and therefore require not just evidence, but extraordinary evidence.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

Still waiting, Mikey.

The burden of research or scholarship is always on the one making the outlandish claim, or the one asking for money. 
The old onus on the anus rule. 
My claim that the traditional values of the commonwealth of Virginia call for the segregation of races is self evidently true.  
And my claim about socialism being defined by government ownership of the means of production is almost verbatim from the dictionary.  
Your claims to the contrary are extraordinary, and therefore require not just evidence, but extraordinary evidence.

Still that when you hear “traditional values” you think it’s about racism says more about you than anyone else.

---

Original Season Ticket Holder - Retired  1995 - 2020


At some point you just have to let go of what you thought should happen and live in what is happening.
 

The burden of research or scholarship is always on the one making the outlandish claim, or the one asking for money. 
The old onus on the anus rule. 
My claim that the traditional values of the commonwealth of Virginia call for the segregation of races is self evidently true.  
And my claim about socialism being defined by government ownership of the means of production is almost verbatim from the dictionary.  
Your claims to the contrary are extraordinary, and therefore require not just evidence, but extraordinary evidence.

Still that when you hear “traditional values” you think it’s about racism says more about you than anyone else.

Mikey got a guilty conscience lol

---

The burden of research or scholarship is always on the one making the outlandish claim, or the one asking for money. 
The old onus on the anus rule. 
My claim that the traditional values of the commonwealth of Virginia call for the segregation of races is self evidently true.  
And my claim about socialism being defined by government ownership of the means of production is almost verbatim from the dictionary.  
Your claims to the contrary are extraordinary, and therefore require not just evidence, but extraordinary evidence.

Still that when you hear “traditional values” you think it’s about racism says more about you than anyone else.

Black folks were kept separate and inferior in Virginia from 1619 to 1959.   Name a stronger tradition. Not all Virginians went to school.  Not all of them went to church.  Some drank, some didn't.  Some were loyal to the British, some weren't. Some believed in capitalism and free trade, some believed in tariffs. But until 1959 they were all segregated, or worse (except military personell, who desgregated in 1948).  All of them were involved in it.  Everyone.  For 340 years.  Yes, the last 60 years have been about fixing that, but still, nearly everyone either experienced this tradition, or has a living grandparent who experienced it.  Soon the tradition will fade from living memory, but that day is not today.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

Because white people have only ever done bad things.

---

I'm not saying there aren't any good parts of our traditional values.  In fact, if we limit the discussion to economics only, and confine "tradition" to the period from 1865 to 1929 only, those are some pretty good values that we would do well to try to bring back.  But that's not what most politicians mean when they talk about "traditional values".  Unfortunately most politicians intend it to be a dog whistle for bigots who want to go back to the days when no one was openly gay, and blacks and women all knew their place.

You're showing your moron again. Not everyone who believes in traditional values is a bigot who hates gays and thinks blacks and women should know their place. My God you are just dumb.

---

Because white people have only ever done bad things.

Who said that? Not me. In all those points in history, some white Virginians tried to improve the status of black people, and even the worst racists of the bunch did some good things in other areas of life.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

I'm not saying there aren't any good parts of our traditional values.  In fact, if we limit the discussion to economics only, and confine "tradition" to the period from 1865 to 1929 only, those are some pretty good values that we would do well to try to bring back.  But that's not what most politicians mean when they talk about "traditional values".  Unfortunately most politicians intend it to be a dog whistle for bigots who want to go back to the days when no one was openly gay, and blacks and women all knew their place.

You're showing your moron again. Not everyone who believes in traditional values is a bigot who hates gays and thinks blacks and women should know their place. My God you are just dumb.

Just because you don't make those associations doesn't mean that nobody makes them. The politicians who say these things are aiming at people like you and also at people who make these associations. No one chooses their words more carefully than a politician. They know what they're doing.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

You're showing your moron again. Not everyone who believes in traditional values is a bigot who hates gays and thinks blacks and women should know their place. My God you are just dumb.

Just because you don't make those associations doesn't mean that nobody makes them. The politicians who say these things are aiming at people like you and also at people who make these associations.  No one chooses their words more carefully than a politician.  They know what they're doing.

People like whom? What's Americus like?

---

Just because you don't make those associations doesn't mean that nobody makes them. The politicians who say these things are aiming at people like you and also at people who make these associations.  No one chooses their words more carefully than a politician.  They know what they're doing.

People like whom? What's Americus like?

She says she is someone who believes in "traditional values" but has no feelings of racism or bigotry. I don't doubt it.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

People like whom? What's Americus like?

She says she is someone who believes in "traditional values" but has no feelings of racism or bigotry. I don't doubt it.

lololol

Uh-huh..

---

People like whom? What's Americus like?

She says she is someone who believes in "traditional values" but has no feelings of racism or bigotry. I don't doubt it.

So, people who want traditional values aren't necessarily racist or have racist intentions. Correct?

---

Still waiting, Mikey.

The burden of research or scholarship is always on the one making the outlandish claim, or the one asking for money. 
The old onus on the anus rule. 
My claim that the traditional values of the commonwealth of Virginia call for the segregation of races is self evidently true.  
And my claim about socialism being defined by government ownership of the means of production is almost verbatim from the dictionary.  
Your claims to the contrary are extraordinary, and therefore require not just evidence, but extraordinary evidence.

Don't duck the question I asked. Who are the REAL economists who say Norway, Mexico, and Brazil are socialist countries? Who are the REAL historians who define what traditional values are? 

You're such a rube, man. Seriously.

---

Because white people have only ever done bad things.

No, but history shows that white people have done the most bad things, especially things against other races.

---

R.I.P. Stroudcrowd1

You don't know [BLEEP] about history, then.

---

Because white people have only ever done bad things.

No, but history shows that white people have done the most bad things, especially things against other races.

I can agree with that. But it’s also a statement which must be taken into context. 

Races around the world have treated their own races and those from competing tribes and factions with unimaginable horror, including cannibalism, slavery, rape and mass murder. The context is the history of exploration and colonialism. What other race spent the middle centuries in world exploration and conquest on the scale of Europeans? The races which didn’t were satisfied with doing their marauding in relative proximity. The point being, Europeans do not have a monopoly on doing “bad things”, far from it. They just did it on a larger stage.

---

Because white people have only ever done bad things.

No, but history shows that white people have done the most bad things, especially things against other races.

So says your college professors right? You should catch up on history, you might actually learn something. Good grief this country (world) is [BLEEP]..

---

"If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you always got"

Because white people have only ever done bad things.

No, but history shows that white people have done the most bad things, especially things against other races.

I think white people have done the most bad things, and the most good things.  Because white people have done the most things.  White men in particular.

---