The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Chad Reuter 4 Round Mock
|
Quote:You're trying to suggest that someone who tests in the bottom 10th percentile can actually be a good athlete? Hes a good enough athlete to get his job done and beat the guy in front of him thats all you really have to be. You overrate and overuse sparq. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! Quote:Hes a good enough athlete to get his job done and beat the guy in front of him thats all you really have to be. The problem with the sparq athlete metrics is not limited to, but definitely includes what you were getting at. At some point you're a good enough athlete. Scoring in the 50th percentile or the 90th percentile doesn't make a difference in most situations. Once you're good enough to do your job, that's it. You don't need to be 99th percentile spark rating.
Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."
Quote:He's 307 lbs.... ran a 5.1 with a 27" vert.Those aren't good numbers for an NFL quality DT. Slightly heavier than average and far less athletic than the average NFL DT. Quote:Hes a good enough athlete to get his job done and beat the guy in front of him thats all you really have to be.But what if he's not? He was good enough to beat college lineman who are probably selling cars right now, but will he beat NFL quality lineman? I would guess not terribly often. Especially with the serious work ethic concerns too.
A scout called Brantley a fake tough guy. Don't know if that's true but I found it funny as hell
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:Shaheen is the only pick I like from this draft. Ew. Your being ridiculous for picking a Tight End with the 4th overall pick. Just absolutely ridiculous. I know you don't want Fournette at 4, but come on cuh. Quote:Your being ridiculous for picking a Tight End with the 4th overall pick. Just absolutely ridiculous.I'm assuming Thomas is off the board and we won't be seriously considering Lattimore, Adams, and Hooker due to FA additions. In that case Howard is comfortably the best pick we could make. He would help every facet of the offense.
I like Howard in the first round, I don't think we will be picking at 4
A good loser is a good loser
Switch our Brantley for Roderick Johnson and I really like it given what was available.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! Quote:I'm assuming Thomas is off the board and we won't be seriously considering Lattimore, Adams, and Hooker due to FA additions.If we think he's got a Gronk-like ceiling then it's hard to argue against that. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.