Oops.


http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/02/politics/c...r-meeting/

---

Let me see if I have this straight. The people who say that the meeting of Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch was nefarious are saying that the meeting of Sessions and the Russian ambassador is strictly benign, nothing to see here.


Funny how it all depends on who you're for and who you're against.


Political opportunism at its best.

Apples... Pitchforks... You should be able to see the difference....

---

Oops.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/02/politics/c...r-meeting/

 

Did you read the whole article?

---

#Russian #butthurt #comrade

The socialists are calling us Marxist sympathizers.... They don't even understand the ideological pretzels that they put themselves in.


Clinton gave these people 20% of our uranium and her husband got 750k. But Trump is the closet commie?

---

The socialists are calling us Marxist sympathizers.... They don't even understand the ideological pretzels that they put themselves in.


Clinton gave these people 20% of our uranium and her husband got 750k. But Trump is the closet commie?

 

Fake news. Clinton never gave the Russians 20% of our uranium. You are peddling lies. 

---

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/03/02/us...=0&topic=h


Seems like some key republicans in congress are beginning to break ranks

---

Did you read the whole article?

I did and read the uncomfortable words of a person trying to wiggle out of an accusatory lie.

---

Fake news. Clinton never gave the Russians 20% of our uranium. You are peddling lies.

Lol. Uranium one.

---

Was he asked specifically if he had contact on behalf of Trump? Or had Contact with the Russians in General? Because if he was ask if was on behalf of Trump, this is a non-story

---

Was he asked specifically if he had contact on behalf of Trump? Or had Contact with the Russians in General? Because if he was ask if was on behalf of Trump, this is a non-story

The question was clearly about ongoing contact between the Trump campaign and Russian State actors to kiloude about the election. You're right this is a non-story. I forget by the end of the night the Claire mccaskill lying about her role on the armed services committee will dominate The Narrative.

---

The question was clearly about ongoing contact between the Trump campaign and Russian State actors to kiloude about the election. You're right this is a non-story. I forget by the end of the night the Claire mccaskill lying about her role on the armed services committee will dominate The Narrative.

 

kiloude? How old are you?

---

LOL.  This circus is getting kind of funny.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

<a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/03/02/amid-russia-uproar-sessions-gets-boost-from-senate-allies-and-dem-s-twitter-flub.html'>LOL. This circus is getting kind of funny.</a>

Aaaaanndd he just recused himself.

---

Aaaaanndd he just recused himself.

Nothing is going on though.

---

Aaaaanndd he just recused himself.

Nothing is going on though.

 

That doesn't really mean anything though.  He is going to recuse himself from “any existing or future investigations” regarding the 2016 presidential campaign.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

The recusal has nothing to do with this accusation

---

Funny lol

---

Yea so evidently the Russian ambassador Flynn, sessions, trump's son-in-law, et al have been meeting with since at least last summer...is a Russian spy. One of the top spies and a recruiter.


YOU CANNOT MAKE THIS STUFF UP

---

How can you be a Russian "spy" when you're the Russian ambassador, from the Russian government and everyone knows about it?

---

What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???

Cool another Cold War!


The Mission Impossible franchise lives on

---