Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Cut him he is wasting space on the roster

#21

I would say there's a <10% chance of Branch getting cut. However, given how much time Alualu has gotten at 3-technique, I think Hood is toast. Which is a shame because he's an ok player, just expendable given Bennett/Abry/Alualu and the fact that he has a $4m non-guaranteed salary this year. 


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#22

Quote:I was saying that too a few days ago, and I said it last year during the pre-season as well. And then he intercepted Stafford's pass and got a sack in the third pre-season game. They're a scheming unit and aren't good enough to get sacks on their own. They were running with standard formations and plays last week, that's why none of our starters have gotten sacks.


Good point
You Gotta Be Able To Run Da' Rock~
Reply

#23

Quote:Watching Branch's performance on DVR the first couple of preseason games I can't see how he makes the final cut



He runs into the tackle and then he flails his arms. He literally gives the defense nothing but a warm body. Everyone who says he's on a contract year this and there's no way he's cut that...obviously they haven't watched him play because he is horrible.
Reply

#24

Quote:I would say there's a <10% chance of Branch getting cut. However, given how much time Alualu has gotten at 3-technique, I think Hood is toast. Which is a shame because he's an ok player, just expendable given Bennett/Abry/Alualu and the fact that he has a $4m non-guaranteed salary this year. 
 

 

I'd rather them keep Hood than Branch. At least Hood got his hands on a ball vs the Giants. That said, I reiterate that I think both are gone meaning only 9 DLs in order to keep an extra player elsewhere like Neal Sterling, Corey Grant, Austin Pasztor, Thurston Armbrister or Nick Marshall.


'02
Reply

#25

Quote:I see a 9 player DL...


 

 

starters: Odrick, Miller, Marks, Clemons


backups: Alualu, Davis, A.Jones, Bennett, C. Smith


 

Ziggy Hood and Andre Branch are tough cuts to make, but the roster needs players elsewhere.
 

I see them keeping 10 and I think Ziggy is going to easily make the team. Most posters here are too bullish on Marks's return, he hasn't even practiced yet and I wouldn't be shocked it he's kept on PUP to begin the season. Even if he's good to go week one, he's going to need some time to get up to speed and will likely be on a limited snap count.

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#26

2 years ago Branch had a good season, last year he was hurt. I think he makes the team and a couple plays tonight
Reply

#27

Was hoping this was Yo Boy's new Henne thread
IT WAS ALWAYS THE JAGS
Reply

#28

As much as people hate to hear it, Branch is still one of the top LEO options on this roster.

 

There haven't been enough players who have shown they can do it in real games or have done enough this offseason or preseason to push him off the roster.

 

They aren't going to give the job to some random guy who has shown even less and just cross their fingers and hope they can get more regular season production from him than they have from Branch.

 

It is what it is until we have actual better options. I think it is unlikely they move forward based on wishful thinking.


Reply

#29

Quote:I'd rather them keep Hood than Branch. At least Hood got his hands on a ball vs the Giants. That said, I reiterate that I think both are gone meaning only 9 DLs in order to keep an extra player elsewhere like Neal Sterling, Corey Grant, Austin Pasztor, Thurston Armbrister or Nick Marshall.
 

Sterling is PS

Grant will be held over Pierce

Pasztor is most likely gone

Nick Marshall will go PS


Armbrister might be only one that might stick to active roster...

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#30

They will probably do some stunts tonight and Branch will look better
<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>
Reply

#31

Quote:As much as people hate to hear it, Branch is still one of the top LEO options on this roster.

 

There haven't been enough players who have shown they can do it in real games or have done enough this offseason or preseason to push him off the roster.

 

They aren't going to give the job to some random guy who has shown even less and just cross their fingers and hope they can get more regular season production from him than they have from Branch.

 

It is what it is until we have actual better options. I think it is unlikely they move forward based on wishful thinking.
 

I'm huge Davis and Smith fans, but a good rotation of LEO's will be critical to our success this year.  If Fowler was around, maybe his spot would be in jeopardy. 

Reply

#32

Quote:I'm huge Davis and Smith fans, but a good rotation of LEO's will be critical to our success this year.  If Fowler was around, maybe his spot would be in jeopardy. 
 

You are delusional if you really don't think his spot is already in jeopardy. He has shown nothing.

Reply

#33

Quote:I'd rather them keep Hood than Branch. At least Hood got his hands on a ball vs the Giants. That said, I reiterate that I think both are gone meaning only 9 DLs in order to keep an extra player elsewhere like Neal Sterling, Corey Grant, Austin Pasztor, Thurston Armbrister or Nick Marshall.
Paz is cuttable is Bo can play the swing T.

I think we stay at 10 on DL: Clemons, Davis, Smith, Jones, Bennett, Odrick, AluAlu, Miller, Hood, Branch

The lovefest for Cap has got to stop lol or at least slow down... he's a PS guy. Maybe he gets moved up if Branch still isn't producing a few weeks in... maybe.

 

Sterling is interesting in that with his size he could be a "swing" WR/TE 

Speaking of which... anyone remember Ernest Wilford? Didn't he switch to TE one year? lol

 

I've heard a lot of people raving about Armbrister... if they keep 6 LB he's definitely in.

 

Marshall and Grant seem destined for PS, but Storm's lackluster play open up a spot for Grant, if we keep 5 RBs.

I don't think Marshall will be safely stashed on the PS though... so not sure who gets cut to make a spot for him.

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#34

Quote:I'm huge Davis and Smith fans, but a good rotation of LEO's will be critical to our success this year.  If Fowler was around, maybe his spot would be in jeopardy. 
Exactly. The numbers aren't there to push him off the roster at this point.

Reply

#35

Quote:Exactly. The numbers aren't there to push him off the roster at this point.
 

Whoa calm down there, you are being delusional...

 

It's preseason, COME ON MAN.

Reply

#36

Quote:You are delusional if you really don't think his spot is already in jeopardy. He has shown nothing.


We've already had this discussion. He'll show up when they being scheming stunts and delays for him. That's not going to happen in preseason. If Fowler was healthy he'd be on the bubble but fortunately for Branch he's not.
"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot."
Reply

#37

But he can bring down the QB if he's unblocked from a DL stunt
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#38

Do not forget about Skuda. He has been playing LEO sometimes. Could be they are to cut one of the LEO,s
Reply

#39

Quote:He'll show up when they being scheming stunts and delays for him. 
 

Wow. Impressive.

Reply

#40

Quote:Do not forget about Skuda. He has been playing LEO sometimes. Could be they are to cut one of the LEO,s
I think that's more along the lines of preparing him in case of emergency. My guess is that the team keeps three LEOs (Clemons, Smith, Davis). If Skuta can fill in there on a limited basis, they might be able to deactivate one of those three in favor of a player at another position and use Skuta as an emergency/lightning package LEO.

Reply




Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!