Fowler needs no better comparison than Ryan Davis.

Sorry but no.  Fowler is way more talented.  #justbecausesamesizesameweightmeanstheyaresameplayer

---

Sorry but no.  Fowler is way more talented.  #justbecausesamesizesameweightmeanstheyaresameplayer

 

for that matter, just because size, weight, speed, power is the same doesnt mean someone is the same player either. 

 

people get too caught up in numbers sometimes. 

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

Newsflash: this is a thread about comparisons.


Position, use in this defense, size, length, athleticisms are all similar from Fowler to Davis.

Both play with heart and a lot of effort

---

<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>

Newsflash: this is a thread about comparisons.


Position, use in this defense, size, length, athleticisms are all similar from Fowler to Davis.

Both play with heart and a lot of effort

 

and he is also similar in all those facets to suggs...

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

and he is also similar in all those facets to suggs...

Very true. maybe his floor right now is a Ryan Davis and if he develops to his max potential, Terrell Suggs.

---

<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>

Lol Im not gonna debate with you because this is my opinion.. You should show your comparison,instead of just saying No to someone elses.

People rather tell you how wrong you are than state their own opinion on the topic.

---

People rather tell you how wrong you are than state their own opinion on the topic.

 

based on your posting history, im just going to assume that this post is wrong too. 

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

based on your posting history, im just going to assume that this post is wrong too.

Why you so negatives towards everybody post? How about you state your comparisons so you can be judge too. Smh people always wanna throw stones..

---

Why you so negatives towards everybody post? How about you state your comparisons so you can be judge too. Smh people always wanna throw stones..

gotta stop focusing on the negative. your posts are generally terrible. its not even just me. 

 

there are plenty of posts i agree with, plenty of posts which state my opinion, and plenty of posts where i disagree and dont have a problem saying so. 

 

thats what this board is for. 

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

based on your posting history, im just going to assume that this post is wrong too.

Posting history? Man if you don't get your nerd [BLEEP] on somewhere. Watch the road not my posting history Elroy.

---

Posting history? Man if you don't get your nerd [BAD WORD REMOVED] on somewhere. Watch the road not my posting history Elroy.

Hahahahahahha

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

I like the post and agree with it and JJ watt isn't that good Williams could easily be better

I know it's been said before...


...but this is quite possibly the dumbest thing I've read on this board.

---

I know it's been said before...


...but this is quite possibly the dumbest thing I've read on this board.

 

it is definitely top 3. 

---

Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."

it is definitely top 3.

Tom Brady sucks.

---

Tom Brady sucks.

Effort guy. No skill to speak of.

---

I know it's been said before...


...but this is quite possibly the dumbest thing I've read on this board.

Yeah, it's almost sig worthy.


I recommend he create a new screen name and just pretend like he never said that.

---

Maybe he just has blind hate for the Texans and was hoping he'd rally some Jags fans to his side.  Unfortunately, saying Watt is not good isn't realistic at all.  If he had said something along the lines that Watt is really good but slightly overrated then maybe he could have gotten a couple votes (not from me though) or at least not as much heat. 

---

Is Danny Sheldon the next Vince wilfork?

---

Twitter Follow: @jSp3nce

Michael Bennett - Sen'Derrick Marks

 

Grady Jerrett - Roy Miller

---

<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>

Newsflash: this is a thread about comparisons.


Position, use in this defense, size, length, athleticisms are all similar from Fowler to Davis.

Both play with heart and a lot of effort

yeah 1 of the big mistakes people make when talking about prospects they look at College production and stead of projecting player development. It's easy to say ok Vic Beasley is more natural pass rusher when u look at sack numbers, but i truly believe 2 or 3 yrs down the road Dante Fowler will be better player.

---