Where did i say that?

 

What you did say implies that.

 

If you want to make a big deal about award winners not winning Super Bowls, your brain is in the wrong place. Right now we are just trying to get back into the playoffs.

---

What you did say implies that.


If you want to make a big deal about award winners not winning Super Bowls, your brain is in the wrong place. Right now we are just trying to get back into the playoffs.

I dont how you implied that lol


All im saying, awards do not matter or tim couch would still be in nfl, chris weinke would br hof in the making and tim tebow would have a ring

---

I dont how you implied that lol


All im saying, awards do not matter or Tim Couch would still be in NFL, Chris Weinke would be HOF in the making, and Tim Tebow would have a ring.

 

If winning the Super Bowl is your criterion for a quarterback being elite, then you should say Jameis Winston is better because he won the college football national championship.

---

To rephrase the question, it isn't so much about 'NFL-ready' vs. 'Raw', as it is 'NFL-ready' vs. 'Potential'.

 

Obviously, there will be rare QB prospects such as Andrew Luck who was not only NFL ready, but still had a lot of room for growth, because of his immense physical tools. But, for the vast majority of prospects who are hyped up as being a 'day 1 starter', they may be as good as they will ever be. When I hear people talk about Teddy Bridgewater, they say he most valuable trait is his knowledge of the game. That's a good thing to have, but if he already knows as much about football as there is to know, how much better can his game become, before his god-given physical/mental tools limit him.

---