The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Trump rejects TIME for Man of Year
|
(12-03-2017, 09:01 PM)Sneakers Wrote:(12-03-2017, 10:35 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: So, lack of "mental ability" to perform a highly sought after skill automatically translates to a demand for $15 an hour for a skill a kiosk or robot can perform? I have no idea. IT was just an example. What do you call a "significant percentage"? There are plenty of trades like plumbing, electricians, HVAC, sanitation, welding that the majority of people have the mental capacity to learn. (12-03-2017, 08:31 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote:(12-03-2017, 06:10 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: I am not unsympathetic to situations like the Disney situation. All I am saying is there are plenty of ways to improve yourself and be employable. I agree 100%. Trump was trying to toughen up visa renewals last time I checked, but not sure what became of that. http://money.cnn.com/2017/10/25/technolo...index.html We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
(12-03-2017, 09:38 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:(12-03-2017, 09:01 PM)Sneakers Wrote: If you re-read my post carefully, you will realize I neither stated, or even suggested, that the inability to perform a task requiring a higher mental capacity translated into any wage entitlement whatsoever. I am merely suggesting that, for a significant percentage of the workforce, anything more than very modest advancement is simply not possible due to lack of mental ability. Those trades will mostly be gone in 20 years, automation is much further along than we give it credit for. Robots are making and repairing robots now, it won't be much longer before they move to creation rather than just repetition. “An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato
(12-04-2017, 03:21 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote:(12-03-2017, 09:38 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: I have no idea. IT was just an example. What do you call a "significant percentage"? There are plenty of trades like plumbing, electricians, HVAC, sanitation, welding that the majority of people have the mental capacity to learn. Skynet!! I think it is important to have a plan for workers displaced by robots. Not so much the teenager replaced by a kiosk at McDonald's, but the 50 year old making widgets at a factory. Automation sparks so many conversations including robot tax, and how the federal government will intervene in AI progress to ensure they get their cut. It will be interesting to see where it goes
(12-04-2017, 07:06 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:(12-04-2017, 03:21 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: Those trades will mostly be gone in 20 years, automation is much further along than we give it credit for. Robots are making and repairing robots now, it won't be much longer before they move to creation rather than just repetition. Exactly the point above, an increasingly large percentage of our population will be unemployable in the near future. How do we accommodate those who would work but are not capable? We cannot let people just starve either. “An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato
(12-04-2017, 02:00 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote:(12-04-2017, 07:06 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: Skynet!! I think it is important to have a plan for workers displaced by robots. Not so much the teenager replaced by a kiosk at McDonald's, but the 50 year old making widgets at a factory. Automation sparks so many conversations including robot tax, and how the federal government will intervene in AI progress to ensure they get their cut. It will be interesting to see where it goes Darwinism. They are not our responsibility. Notice to dumb people - stop breeding. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
(12-04-2017, 02:00 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote:(12-04-2017, 07:06 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: Skynet!! I think it is important to have a plan for workers displaced by robots. Not so much the teenager replaced by a kiosk at McDonald's, but the 50 year old making widgets at a factory. Automation sparks so many conversations including robot tax, and how the federal government will intervene in AI progress to ensure they get their cut. It will be interesting to see where it goes I don't have the answer, and have this conversation a lot with a buddy of mine. You can go one way with the government providing everybody with a "living wage", but we all know that will be abused worse than welfare and food stamps. On the other hand, the displaced workers need somewhere to go, otherwise they will do whatever is necessary to protect and feed their families, which likely includes harming other people. It is an issue that each administration will probably be kicking down the road until it really comes to a head.
(12-04-2017, 02:43 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:(12-04-2017, 02:00 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: Exactly the point above, an increasingly large percentage of our population will be unemployable in the near future. How do we accommodate those who would work but are not capable? We cannot let people just starve either. If every adult citizen gets (say) $20,000 to do with as they please, and are free to supplement that with actual income, it should be abuse free. It would be abused only if the government micromanages it, which it probably will by setting income levels above which one does not get the "living wage." Of course there will be those who spend the $20,000 a year on drugs and alcohol, but that's their choice. I wouldn't call that abusing the system. "Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"
(12-04-2017, 04:06 PM)MalabarJag Wrote:To your first point, setting a threshold will only make people MORE lazy. It would have to be truly universal.(12-04-2017, 02:43 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: I don't have the answer, and have this conversation a lot with a buddy of mine. You can go one way with the government providing everybody with a "living wage", but we all know that will be abused worse than welfare and food stamps. On the other hand, the displaced workers need somewhere to go, otherwise they will do whatever is necessary to protect and feed their families, which likely includes harming other people. To your last point, it is interesting because Mark Zuckerberg openly supports universal income, as I am sure guys like Tim Cook & Jeff Bezos do also. These guys understand people would use that "living wage" to buy iPhones and shop on Amazon & Facebook with them.
(12-04-2017, 02:38 PM)TrivialPursuit Wrote:(12-04-2017, 02:00 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: Exactly the point above, an increasingly large percentage of our population will be unemployable in the near future. How do we accommodate those who would work but are not capable? We cannot let people just starve either. ![]() “An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
If anyone wonders why I smoke weed...
If something can corrupt you, you're corrupted already.
- Bob Marley ![]() (12-03-2017, 11:58 AM)Byron LeftTown Wrote:(12-02-2017, 10:07 PM)rollerjag Wrote: That this is what you hear shows more about who you're listening to tell you what the "left" is saying than what is actually said. Suddenly you trust the CIA? Did you even read what he posted? Show me a single source from mainstream media reporting or opining that guns cause crime or all men are raging rapists. Hyperbole like this isn't any more factual than the excesses many of you decry.
If something can corrupt you, you're corrupted already.
- Bob Marley ![]() (12-03-2017, 02:04 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote:(12-02-2017, 10:07 PM)rollerjag Wrote: That this is what you hear shows more about who you're listening to tell you what the "left" is saying than what is actually said. You're making no progress towards proving your point with horse [BLEEP] like this.
If something can corrupt you, you're corrupted already.
- Bob Marley ![]()
(12-04-2017, 11:06 PM)rollerjag Wrote:(12-03-2017, 11:58 AM)Byron LeftTown Wrote: RJ, can you tell us who is your trusted source in mainstream reporting so we can also be enlightened? The CIA claims we can't trust any of them: I trust the CIA implicitly when they say they are liars and disinformation agents. Not otherwise, for those same reasons. Check the cringe-worthy SNL video called "Welcome To Hell", which does suggest all men are raging rapists. Or the many times Rahm said Chicago's high murder rate is due to the presence of guns from Indiana, as if the guns pulled their own trigger. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (12-04-2017, 07:06 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: Skynet!! I think it is important to have a plan for workers displaced by robots. Not so much the teenager replaced by a kiosk at McDonald's, but the 50 year old making widgets at a factory. Automation sparks so many conversations including robot tax, and how the federal government will intervene in AI progress to ensure they get their cut. It will be interesting to see where it goes Robots in the future? What about a plan for workers already displaced by overseas labor through the last 30 years?
When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.
(12-06-2017, 10:41 PM)Sneakers Wrote:(12-04-2017, 07:06 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: Skynet!! I think it is important to have a plan for workers displaced by robots. Not so much the teenager replaced by a kiosk at McDonald's, but the 50 year old making widgets at a factory. Automation sparks so many conversations including robot tax, and how the federal government will intervene in AI progress to ensure they get their cut. It will be interesting to see where it goes What is your proposed resolution?
(12-07-2017, 01:12 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:(12-06-2017, 10:41 PM)Sneakers Wrote: Robots in the future? What about a plan for workers already displaced by overseas labor through the last 30 years? ![]() “An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato
|
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.