The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Over/Under on Blake Bortles 2015 season.
|
Quote:Bortles is a very raw QB who won't become NFL all-pro polished for several years. It's not like 12 weeks in the offseason is enough to change a lifetime of throwing a certain way.Nothing wrong with keeping expectations low... I don't think Bortles is an all-world beater in year 2. But I would hope that we didn't select a guy #3 overall who still needed another year to get it working. He was supposed to sit and learn last year, he was thrown into the fire to learn. The entire offseason he was working on mechanics, TC was for implementation of the new OC gameplan. His 2nd year should be leaps and bounds better than year 1 (especially if the WRs catch more than they drop and the Oline blocks more than they don't) Looking at Tannehill's rookie season and Bortles, very similar (Tannehill arguably had a better team overall, but was also only a 2 yr QB at A&M) I'd rather Bortles post 4k 27/12 65% comp. Because I think that's where he needs to be. (Tannys 3rd year stats) but I won't hang him out to dry if he posts a more modest 3900 24/17 60%.... I'd be ecstatic really. But I think he could (should) make a big jump. Tossing the rock to Arob and JT. With 3 different types of threats from the backfield, Drob, Yeldon, and Gerhart. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! Quote:But I think he could (should) make a big jump. I think we both agree, just differ on what we consider a 'big jump'. GO JAGUARS!
Not getting a whole lot of love on the NFL site projections.
http://www.nfl.com/fantasyfootball/story...l-32-teams
What lies behind us, and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.
Quote:Not getting a whole lot of love on the NFL site projections.Winning will change that perception.
Quote:I'm thinking Pretty close to on point
Go Jags!
*To stay up for atleast 2 years 3/6/17 2016 draft players I think will be good
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.